A. BADHARUDEEN
Fr. Joseph Kuzhinjalil, S/O. Augusty – Appellant
Versus
Visalakshi – Respondent
ORDER :
This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C’ hereinafter), by the petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 and 2 in C.C.No.128/2018 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Sasthamcotta. They seek quashment of the above proceedings.
2. Heard Adv.Sri.Jomy George, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Adv.Sri.M.R.Sarin, the learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent/original complainant, Sri.M.P.Prasanth, the learned Public Prosecutor and also Adv.Sri.Firoz K.M., who is appointed as Amicus Curiae, to assist the Court, to decide the question of law involved in this matter.
3. Perused the judgments placed by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Amicus Curiae, in detail, in a paper booklet form, along with the complaint, the order taking cognizance and the relevant materials.
4. The prosecution case buds from a private complaint, (a copy of which is produced as Annexure A1), filed by the de facto complainant before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Sasthamcotta, alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 499, 500, 501 and 120B r
Achuthanandan V.S. v. V.G.Kamalamma reported in 2008 (2) KHC 562
Bhanwar Singh and another vs. State of Rajasthan
C.H.Mohammed Koya v. T.K.S.M.A.Muthukoya reported in 1978 KLT 699
M/s. Frick India Ltd. v. Union of India and Others
Mathew v. Abraham reported in 2002 (3) KLT 282
Prakash Nath Khanna and Another v. Commissioner of Income Tax and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.