IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
CHINNAPPAN S/O MUTHUSWAMI – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Crl. Rev. Pet. No. 797 of 2024
Decided On : 05-08-2024
Criminal - Trespass and Grievous Hurt - IPC Sections 326, 452 - The court upheld the conviction under Section 326 for causing grievous hurt with a dangerous weapon, interpreting the elements of the offense and confirming the trial court's findings.
Fact of the Case:
The accused was charged with criminal trespass and causing grievous hurt to the complainant and his wife using an iron pipe, resulting in serious injuries.
Finding of the Court:
The court confirmed the conviction under Section 326 IPC, finding sufficient evidence of grievous hurt caused by the accused, while acquitting him of the trespass charge under Section 452 IPC.
Issues: Whether the evidence presented was sufficient to uphold the conviction for grievous hurt under Section 326 IPC and whether the acquittal under Section 452 IPC was justified.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused voluntarily caused grievous hurt using a dangerous weapon, fulfilling the criteria set out in Section 326 IPC.
Result: The Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed.
ORDER :
1. This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Section 438 read with Section 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, challenging the judgment in Crl. Appeal No. 137/2018 on the files of Additional Sessions Court, Thodupuzha, dated 06.05.2024, arising out of the judgment in C.C. No. 245/2013 on the files of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Peerumedu, dated 28.09.2018.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner/accused and the learned Public Prosecutor on admission.
3. In this matter, the prosecution case is that on 07.11.2012 at 10.00 a.m., the accused criminally trespassed into the veranda of PW1's residence bearing building No. 174, Ward No. 18 of Vandipperiya Panchayat, which forms part of a layam building with an iron pipe, after making preparation to commit offence on account of his previous enmity towards PW1 and his wife Devaki, a deaf and dumb lady and voluntarily caused grievous hurt to PW1 and his wife Devaki by striking with the iron pipe, causing fracture of bone on the right forearm of PW1 and fracture of both bones of the left forearm of Devaki and thus the accused had committed offence punishable under Sections 452 and 326 of the Indian Penal Code.
4. On completing the pre-trial formalities, the trial court recorded the evidence of PW1 to PW8 and Exhibits P1 to P8 as well as MO1 were marked. Later, the trial court completed trial and heard the matter on merits. Accordingly, the trial court convicted and sentenced the accused as under:
Simple imprisonment for a period of two years and with fine of Rs. 1,000/- (Rs. One Thousand only) for the offence punishable U/s. 326 IPC. If the fine amount is not paid the accused will undergo Simple Imprisonment further for a period of 10 days. Set off allowed.
2. The accused is found not guilty for the offence punishable U/s. 452 IPC and he is acquitted for the said offence.”
5. Thus the accused was convicted and sentenced for the offence punishable under Section 326 of IPC, while acquitting him from the offence punishable under Section 452 of IPC.
6. Challenging the trial court judgment, appeal was filed before the Sessions Court and the Additional Sessions Court heard the appeal and concurred with the finding of conviction while modifying the sentence for the offence under Section 326 of IPC as under:
(ii) In suppression of the sentence imposed by the trial court, accused/appellant is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for 6 months and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for 10 days. Set off allowed by the trial court shall be available to the accused/appellant.
(iii) Accused/appellant is directed to surrender before the trial court to receive the modified sentence on 14.6.2024. On his failure, trial court shall execute the modified sentence as per law. Return the trial court records at the earliest.
7. While assailing the -concurrent7- verdict of conviction for the offence punishable under Section 326 of IPC and the modified sentence imposed on the appellant by the appellate court, the learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that during cross examination, PW1 stated that the Investigating Officer shown MO1 weapon before start of trial and the same is a serious anomaly to disbelieve the entire prosecution. In fact, this challenge was raised before the appellate court and in paragraph No. 9, the appellate court considered the same and found that MO1 pipe was in the court custody after it was produced by the Investigating Officer as per Ext.P7 property list on 07.01.2013 and there was nothing on record to show that the said pipe was returned to the Station
The court established that causing grievous hurt with a dangerous weapon fulfills the criteria for conviction under Section 326 IPC, supported by sufficient evidence.
The court established that the use of a dangerous weapon resulting in grievous hurt satisfies the criteria for conviction under Section 326 IPC, while the absence of intent to commit further offenses....
Conviction requires adequate evidence; lack thereof necessitates a reduction in charges and sentencing.
Revision noted with modifications to the sentence under Section 323 IPC, including compensation to the victim.
The court modified the conviction from Section 326 IPC to Section 324 IPC due to insufficient evidence of grievous harm while affirming the finding of intentional injury.
The prosecution must establish grievous injury under IPC Section 326; absence of such evidence permits conviction under lesser offence Section 323.
Procedural irregularities in sentencing invalidate conviction under IPC.
Conviction under Section 326 IPC modified to Section 325 IPC due to evidence insufficiency regarding weapon recovery, leading to reduced sentencing.
Conviction under Section 326 IPC affirmed where evidence substantiates grievous injury caused by accused's actions despite inconsistencies in testimonies.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.