IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J.
M/s. GEORGE & SONS – Petitioner
Versus
UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, NEW DELHI – Respondent
W.P. (C) Nos. 23146, 28289 of 2022
Decided On : 10-09-2024
Safety Glazing - Motor Vehicles - CMV Rules, 1989, Rule 100 - The court interpreted the amended Rule 100 allowing 'Safety Glazing' conforming to IS standards, emphasizing that penalties cannot be imposed on compliant vehicle owners.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners challenged penalties imposed for using 'Safety Glazing' in vehicles, claiming compliance with the amended CMV Rules, which allow such glazing if it meets specified visual light transmission standards.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the State Government lacked authority to penalize vehicle owners using compliant 'Safety Glazing', as the amendments to the CMV Rules permitted its use under specified conditions.
Issues: Whether the State Government can penalize vehicle owners for using 'Safety Glazing' that conforms to the amended CMV Rules and Indian Standards.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the amended Rule 100 permits 'Safety Glazing' conforming to IS standards, and penalties cannot be imposed if the glazing meets the required visual light transmission.
Result: The penalties imposed on the petitioners were quashed as illegal and unsustainable.
JUDGMENT :
N. NAGARESH, J.
1. The question arising for consideration in these writ petitions is as to whether the State Government in the Departments of Police or Motor Vehicles are legally authorised to penalise owners of motor vehicles who are maintaining the “Standards of Visual Transmission of Light (VLT)” as specified under Rule 100 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 (‘CMV Rules’ for short) as amended with effect from 01.04.2021, by using “Safety Glazing” conforming to the standards stipulated under the Indian Standard; IS.2553 (Part 2) (First Revision) 2019.
2. In W.P. (C) No. 23146/2022, the 1st petitioner is a Partnership Firm. The 1st petitioner is the sole distributor for the State of Kerala for products manufactured by M/s. Garware Hi-Tech Films Limited, Aurangabad, Maharashtra. The 2nd petitioner is a citizen who was imposed with a fine of Rs. 250/- as per Ext.P8 challan issued by the 5th respondent-AMVI, alleging non-compliance of the standards of VLT for the wind screen or window glasses of his vehicle (motor car) bearing registration No. KL-39M-7002.
3. The petitioners in W.P. (C) No. 28289 of 2022 are aggrieved by the action of the Regional Transport Officer in issuing notices threatening cancellation of their registration on the ground that their shops are selling vehicle accessories and affixing sun films in motor vehicles causing alteration, in violation of Sections 52 and 182A(4) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
4. Rule 100 of the CMV Rules as it stood prior to substitution effected from 01.04.2021 as per Ext.P4 Notification, was as follows:
(1) The windscreen and window glass of every motor vehicle including agriculture tractor fitted with cabin, construction equipment vehicle fitted with cabin and combine harvester shall be made of safety glass or safety glazing material:
Provided that in L5 category vehicles (three wheelers) and vehicles with hood and side coves, the window glass may be made of acrylic or plastic transparent sheet.
Explanation - For the purposes of this rule:
(i) safety glass or safety glazing means the materials confirming to IS 2553 (Part 2) (Revision 1): 2019.
(ii) windscreen and window glass of motor vehicle, the inner surface of which is at an angle more than thirty degrees to longitudinal axis of the vehicles, shall be deemed to face to the front.
(2) The safety glass or safety glazing of the windscreen and rear window of every motor vehicle shall be so manufactured to provide not less than seventy percent visual transmission of light and it shall conform to Indian Standard IS 2553 (Part 2) (Revision 1): 2019 as amended from time to time.
(3) The safety glass or safety glazing used for side windows of every motor vehicle shall be so manufactured to provide not less than fifty percent visual transmission of light and it shall conform to Indian Standards IS 2553 (Part 2) (Revision 1): 2019 as amended from time to time.
(3-A) The owner of every motor vehicle shall maintain the visual transmission of light through safety glass or safety glazing as specified in sub-rule (2) and sub-rule (3).
(3-B) The glass of the front wind screen of a combine harvester shall be made of laminated safety glass.
(3-C) In cases where any manufacturer has complied with the provisions of this rule as they exist till the 31st March, 2021, such manufacturer may continue to do so till the 31st March, 2022, and in that situation it shall be presumed as if the provisions of clause (b) of rule 2 of the Central Motor Vehicles (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2020, come into force, on the 1st April, 2022:
Provided that the manufacturers who comply with the provisions of this rule as they exist on the 1st April, 2021, they shall continue to do so.
(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in this rule if the Central Government is of the opinion that it is necessary and expedient to do so in public interest, it may, by order published in the Official Gazette, exempt [any motor vehicle including construction equipment
The court established that vehicle owners cannot be penalized for using compliant 'Safety Glazing' as per the amended CMV Rules.
Authorities cannot penalize vehicle owners for maintaining Safety Glazing that conforms to VLT requirements as per amended Central Motor Vehicles Rules, reflecting lawful compliance.
State authorities cannot penalize vehicle owners for compliance with safety glazing standards specified within the Central Motor Vehicles Rules.
vehicles in public place, flouting the standards in relation to road safety, is likely to endanger the safety of the passengers of such vehicles and also other road users.
Unauthorized modifications to vehicles violate safety standards under the Motor Vehicles Act, posing risks to public safety, necessitating strict enforcement of compliance measures.
Point of Law : If there is any obstruction to the discharge of duties by Enforcement Officers in the Motor Vehicles Department, while conducting inspection in contract carriages and other transport v....
Vehicles must comply with safety standards under the Motor Vehicles Act and related regulations; unauthorized modifications render them unfit for public use.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the provision for electronic monitoring and enforcement of road safety under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and subsequent amendments, as well as the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.