K. BABU
G. Gopan @ Gopakumar, S/O. Janardhana Panicker – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala Rep By The Excise Inspector, Excise Range – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K.BABU, J.
This appeal essentially challenges the legality of the proceeding of a Sessions Court whereby a witness was arraigned as an accused under Section 319 Cr.PC, solely based on his oral testimony in the Court.
Facts:
2. The Excise Inspector, Excise Range Office, Thirupuram, on 12.03.1998 at or about 6.00 p.m., while conducting patrol duty, received information that illicit arrack was stored at House No.546 in Ward No.IV of Karodu Panchayath in Thiruvananthapuram District by one Babu (Accused No.1). The Excise Inspector proceeded to the place of occurrence and recovered a white jerry can containing illicit arrack at the north-eastern side of a room in the building. There was nobody in the said house at the time of the search. Babu, a permanent resident of House No.4 Chenkavila of Karodu Panchayath was in possession of the building. On seeing the Excise party, Babu ran away from the house. The Excise Inspector registered a crime alleging offence under Section 58 of the Kerala Abkari Act arraying Babu as the sole accused. After completing the investigation, the Excise Inspector submitted the final report before the jurisdictional Magistrate. The learned Magistrate commit
State of Karnataka v. Registrar General
State of Bihar v. Lal Krishna Advani 2003 (8) SCC 361
The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohammad Naim AIR 1964 SC 703 : 1964 (1) CriLJ 549
R. K. Lakshmanan v. A. K. Srinivasan 1975 (2) SCC 466 : 1975 CriLj 1545
Niranjan Patnaik v. Sashibhusan Kar AIR 1986 SC 819 : 1986 CriLj 911
Smithesh v. State of Kerala 2019 (2) KLT 974
Baby v. State of Kerala 2020 (2) KLT 590
The court clarified that evidence for summoning additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. can include statements made during examination-in-chief, and witnesses are protected from self-incriminati....
Contraband Substances - Benefit of doubt - Acquitted - Delay of more than one year in analysing sample has not been satisfactorily explained - This is also a suspicious circumstance, benefit of which....
(1) Immunity against self-incrimination Qualified privilege under proviso to Section 132 of Evidence Act does not grant complete immunity from prosecution to a person who has deposed as a witness and....
(1) Status attained by a person upon being granted pardon, is conditional and the moment such condition is breached, as certified by Prosecutor, protection provided to such person will be taken away ....
(1) Confessional statement made under Section 67 of N.D.P.S. Act before an Intelligence Officer of the D.R.I. would not be admissible in law for recording conviction against accused persons.(2) Exami....
The court upheld the trial court's decision to summon additional accused under Section 319 CrPC based on sufficient evidence from the informant, emphasizing the standard of proof required for such su....
Akbari Act - Non-compliance of mandatory requirements to be complied with at the time of arrest is fatal to the prosecution as the seizure of the contraband has no existence without proving the factu....
Point of law: Law has provided a measure to the prosecution to meet a contingency where the assistance of one or more of the accused is necessitated for ensuring a successful prosecution, and that is....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.