GOPINATH P.
M. A. Ibrahim – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Gopinath P., J.
The petitioner is an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 1961 Act’). For the assessment year 2007-08, the petitioner filed his return of income on 18.5.2007. The petitioner was served with Ext.P1 notice under Section 143(2)(ii) of the 1961 Act, on 22.8.2008. Thereafter, the assessing authority proceeded to issue Ext.P3 order of assessment under sub-section (3) of Section 143, on 30.12.2009, assessing the total income of the petitioner to be Rs.15,28,500/- (Fifteen lakhs twenty-eight thousand five hundred only) and proceeded to demand an amount of Rs.6,09,632/- (Six lakhs nine thousand six hundred thirty-two only) with surcharge, education cess and interest under Section 234 up to the date of the order. Being aggrieved by Ext.P3 order, the petitioner approached the Commissioner by filing Ext.P4 revision petition under Section 264 of the 1961 Act, taking up a contention that the notice issued to the petitioner under Section 143(2)(ii) of the 1961 Act was beyond the time prescribed in the first proviso to Section 143(2)(ii) which provided that no notice as contemplated by that provision shall be served on the assessee after
Garikapati Veeraya v. N. Subbiah Choudhry AIR 1957 SC 540
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra (1994) 4 SCC 602 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 1087
Karimtharuvi Tea Estate Ltd. v. State of Kerala (1966) 60 ITR 262 (SC)
Maharaja Chintamani Saran Nath Shahdeo v. State of Bihar (1999) 8 SCC 16
New India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shanti Misra (1975) 2 SCC 840
Shyam Sunder v. Ram Kumar (2001) 8 SCC 24
Thirumalai Chemicals Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors (2011) 6 SCC 739
Procedural amendments to the Income Tax Act apply retrospectively, affecting the validity of notices issued under the Act.
Statutory time limits for reassessment are fundamental; once expired, subsequent notices for the same assessment year are invalid and undermine taxpayers' certainty.
Notice u/s 148 for AY 2015-16 beyond 6-year old regime limit cannot be issued post-Finance Act 2021; first proviso bars it independently, unaffected by fifth/sixth provisos excluding s.148A time. (32....
S.148 notice for AY 2015-16 issued after 31/03/2022 barred by first proviso to s.149(1); fifth/sixth provisos do not extend old regime limitation period. Reassessment and penalty quashed for want of ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.