SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 1002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. Dias, J.
Rabin B - Petitioner
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By Public Prosecutor
BAIL APPL. NO. 6330 OF 2024
Decided On : 22-08-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sojan Micheal
For the Respondent: Sri.C.S.Hrithwik, Sr.PP

IMPORTANT POINT
The absence of a registered crime against a petitioner is a critical factor in determining the entitlement to pre-arrest bail under the BNSS.

Headnote:

BAIL - PRE-ARREST BAIL - The court addressed an application for pre-arrest bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court highlighted that there was no crime registered against the petitioner at the time of the hearing, leading to the closure of the bail application. The court emphasized the procedural requirement for police to issue a notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS if the petitioner’s presence is needed regarding allegations of a non-bailable offence punishable for less than seven years.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed an application for pre-arrest bail under the BNSS, fearing arrest by the Ambalapuzha Police for an unspecified non-bailable offence.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was no crime registered against the petitioner, as confirmed by the learned Public Prosecutor.

Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to pre-arrest bail in the absence of any registered crime against him.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that in the absence of a registered crime, the application for pre-arrest bail could not be sustained, and the procedural safeguards under the BNSS were applicable.

Result: The bail application was closed, with a stipulation that the petitioner would be notified if his presence was required by the police regarding the allegations.

ORDER :

C.S. Dias, J.

The application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ('BNSS', for short), for an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest by the Ambalapuzha Police Station in an unknown crime, for allegedly committing a non-bailable offence.

3. Heard; Sri.Sojan Micheal, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.C.S.Hrithwik, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that as on today, there is no crime registered against the petitioner as alleged in the bail application. The said submission is recorded.

In the light of the above submission, the bail application is closed. It is made clear that, if the presence of the petitioner is required by the Ambalapuzha police with regard to the allegations made in the bail application, he shall be issued with a notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS, if the offence alleged against him is punishable for less than seven years.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top