SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 1030

2024 DHC 8631
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
REKHA PALLI, SAURABH BANERJEE, JJ.
Anjum Nayyar – Appellant
Versus
Yavar Ehsan – Respondent
MAT. APP. (F.C.) No. 37 of 2023
Decided On : 07-11-2024
Advocates Appeared : 
For the Appellant : Aman Usman
For the Respondent : Chinmaya Sejwal

The court affirmed that extra-judicial divorce via Mubaraat is valid and must be recognized by Family Courts, empowering them to declare marital status under Section 7 of the Family Courts Act.

Headnote:(A) Family Courts Act, 1984 - Section 19 - Dissolution of marriage - Joint petition dismissed by Family Court seeking decree of dissolution as per Mubaraat agreement dated 24.01.2020 - Family Court held petition not maintainable - Joint declaration by parties highlights the acceptance of the dissolution under Muslim Personal Law - Court's jurisdiction under Section 7 allows for declaration of marital status post divorce. (Paras 1, 3, 14)

(B) Muslim Personal Law - Extra-judicial divorce processes recognized, including Mubaraat as a consensual dissolution of marriage - Previous decisions by Apex Court affirm validity of Mubaraat - Obligation on Family Court to acknowledge such agreements under Section 7. (Paras 6, 12, 18)

Facts of the case:
Parties married on 10.07.1997, cohabitated, and separated since April 2016. After issuing a joint declaration on 24.01.2020, parties sought official recognition of marriage dissolution through Family Courts Act.

Findings of Court:
Family Court erroneous in dismissing the joint petition; the marriage effectively dissolved through Mubaraat requires acknowledgment and declaration by the Family Court.

Issues: Whether Family Court erred in denying the request for a declaration of divorce based on an agreement of Mubaraat; interpretation of Section 7's provisions to support dissolution by extra-judicial means.

Ratio Decidendi: The court asserted that upon execution of a documented agreement of Mubaraat, the Family Court must grant a declaration of marital status, upholding principles of personal law governing marriage dissolution.

Result: Appeal allowed; marriage declared dissolved on 24.01.2020, with directions for Family Courts on similar proceedings.

Table of Content
1. details of the marriage and grounds for dissolution. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments for recognition of mubaraat under law. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court's power to declare dissolution of marriage. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. citations from other judgements supporting the case. (Para 16 , 17)
5. final judgment and directions for family court. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT :

REKHA PALLI, J.

1. The present appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (the Act) seeks to assail the judgment dated 19.11.2022 passed by the learned Family Court in M.L. No. 11 of 2022. Vide the impugned judgment, the learned Family Court has dismissed the joint petition filed by the appellant and the respondent seeking a decree of dissolution of their marriage in terms of the declaration made by the parties on 24.01.2020 by way of the joint affidavit filed by them as also their prayer for a decree of declaration to the effect that the agreement/declaration dated 24.01.2020 was binding on the parties.

2. As per the brief factual matrix emerging from the record, the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized on 10.07.1997 at Jamia Nagar, New Delhi as per Muslim Rites and Ceremonies. A Nikahnama (marriage contract) was, accordingly, issued by the Al-Qazi, Betul Qazi, with the meher (dowry) amount fixed at Rs. 51,000/-. After the marriage, the parties cohabited at A-1, Press Enclave, Saket, New Delhi and were blessed with two daughters, who are now both major and are residing with the appellant wife.

3. That subsequently, on account of some temperamental differences between the parties, the parties parted ways and started living separately since April, 2016. After efforts for mediation failed, the respondent husband, with the consent of the appellant, pronounced Talaq on 24.01.2020, on which date, the parties issued a joint declaration by way of an affidavit. It is the case of both parties that even though their marriage stood dissolved as per the Islamic Law after the pronouncement of Talaq by the respondent on 24.01.2020, since there was no public record of this dissolution, they filed a joint petition under para (b) and (d) of explanation to Section 7 of the Act.

4. This petition has been rejected by the learned Family Court, by holding that the petition as filed was not maintainable in its present form. Being aggrieved, the appellant has approached this Court. Upon notice being issued in the appeal on 07.02.2023, the respondent has entered appearance and joins the appellant in praying that the impugned judgment be set aside and it be declared that the marriage between the parties stood dissolved on 24.01.2020.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that while dismissing the petition, the learned Family Court has failed to appreciate that under the Muslim Personal Law currently applicable in India, besides the provision for dissolution of marriage by the Court under Section 2 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939, commonly known as the ‘judicial divorce’, the concept of extra-judicial divorce under the Muslim Personal Law is also recognised under Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937. He submits that the appellant’s marriage with the respondent was dissolved as per Mubaraat, which is one of the modes of divorce recognised under the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 and consequently, the parties had upon dissolution of their marriage through Mubaraat executed a Muabaraat agreement dated 24.01.2020.

6. He further submits that since except for the Mubaraat agreement dated 24.01.2020, the parties do not possess any document issued by any public authority or any Court, they were compelled to approach the Court under Section 7 of the Family Courts Act to seek an official declaration of their marriage having been dissolved. He contends that once the factum of dissolution of marriage of the parties by consent through by Mubaraat stood proved by execution

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top