SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 1066

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
XXXXXXXXXX – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Crl. M.C. No. 1662 of 2024
Decided On : 04-10-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: ROSHIN IPE JOSEPH, SASTHAMANGALAM S. AJITHKUMAR.
For the Respondent: RENJIT GEORGE.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that prima facie evidence of trafficking and sexual harassment justified the continuation of criminal proceedings under IPC Sections 354A and 370.

Headnote:

Quashment - Criminal Proceedings - IPC Sections 354A, 370 - The court analyzed the prima facie applicability of IPC Sections 354A and 370, concluding that the allegations warranted a trial, as the essential elements of the offenses were present.

Fact of the Case:

The accused sought to quash criminal proceedings alleging offenses under IPC Sections 354A and 370, claiming the allegations did not meet the prima facie standard for these offenses.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the allegations, including coercion and demands for sexual favors, established a prima facie case under IPC Sections 354A and 370, warranting a trial.

Issues: Whether the allegations against the accused under IPC Sections 354A and 370 were sufficient to warrant a trial.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the essential elements of trafficking and sexual harassment were present in the allegations, thus justifying the continuation of the proceedings.

Result: The petition to quash the proceedings was dismissed.

ORDER :

1. This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C. for short hereinafter), by the accused, in Crime No. 975/2019 of Ernakulam North Police Station, now pending as S.C. No. 736/2019 on the files of the Assistant Sessions Court-II, Ernakulam, to quash the entire proceedings.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor in detail. Perused the relevant documents.

3. Here the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Sections 354A(1)(ii) and 370(1) (b) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC for short hereinafter) by the accused.

4. While seeking quashment of this proceedings, the learned counsel for the petitioner argued that going by the prosecution allegations, none of the offences alleged would attract prima facie. It is also submitted that as per Annexure 5 order in Crl. M.P. No. 96/2020, the learned Assistant Sessions Judge dismissed the discharge petition filed by the petitioner, which was confirmed by the Sessions Judge, as per Annexure-6 order in Crl. R.P. No. 35/2021. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, since the defacto complainant reached Chennai for attending an official meeting, it could not be held that the accused herein trafficked her for the purpose of exploitation by recruiting, transporting, harbouring, transferring or in other manner dealt under Section 370(1) of IPC so as to attract the said offence. It is also pointed out that even though there is an allegation that the accused demanded the defacto complainant to share her room, the same also would not by itself be sufficient to attract offence under Section 354A(1)(ii) of IPC.

5. Opposing the quashment prayer, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that prima facie offences under Section 370(1)(b) as well as under Section 354A(1)(ii) of IPC would attract and thereby the learned Assistant Sessions Judge dismissed the plea for discharge and the Sessions Judge confirmed the same by Annexure 5 and Annexure 6 orders. Since prosecution materials would substantiate the offences prima facie, the matter would require trial and the quashment prayer would fail.

6. Assimilating the facts of this case, this Crime was registered pursuant to a complaint filed by the defacto complainant before the SHO, Central Police Station, Ernakulam. As per the complaint, the allegation is that while the defacto complainant was working as the General Manager of M/s. Mathew Associates Consultants (P) Ltd. Ernakulam, the accused who had been working as the Managing Director, committed the alleged offences on 31.05.2019.

7. Addressing the argument tendered by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is necessary to consider the ingredients to attract offence under Section 370(1) of IPC. Section 370(1) of IPC provides as under:

    370. Trafficking of person:

(1) Whoever, for the purpose of exploitation, (a) recruits, (b) transports, (c) harbours, (d) transfers, or (e) receives, a person or persons, by:

First - using threats.

Secondly - using force, or any other form of coercion.

Thirdly - by abduction.

Fourthly - by practising fraud, or deception.

Fifthly - by abuse of power.

Sixthly - by inducement, including the giving or receiving of payments or benefits, in order to achieve the consent of any person having control over the person recruited, transported, harboured, transferred or received, commits the offence of trafficking.

Explanation 1 - The expression “exploitation” shall include any act of physical exploitation or any form of sexual exploitation, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude, or the forced removal of organs.

8. Section 143 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS for short hereinafter) is the pari materia provision to Section 370, although there are some differences in the phraseology. Section 143(1) of BNS reads as under:

    143. Trafficking of person:

(1) Whoever, for the purpose of exploitation recruits, transports, harbours, transfers, or receives a

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top