A. BADHARUDEEN
Nandakumar, s/o. k. ramachandran – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
Crl.M.C.No.8843/2023 is at the instance of the accused in Cr.MP No.34/2019 on the files of the Special Court under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, (hereinafter referred to as ‘SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 (Unamended), Kottayam, (Sessions Court) and the prayers are as under:
2. Quash Crl.M.P.No.34 of 2019, pending on the files of Court of Session, Kottayam, arising out of crime no.237 of 2016 of Gandhinagar Police Station, Kottayam revenue district, and further proceedings therefrom”
2. Similarly, Crl.M.C.No.5063 of 2024 is at the instance of the complainant and the prayer is as under:
3. Before analysing the facts and the matter in issue, the parties in these matters will be referred hereinafter as “complainant” and “accused” for easy reference.
4. Heard
State of Haryana and Others V. Bhajan Lal and Others reported in 1992 Supp1 SCC 335
Insults must be targeted at a victim's Scheduled Caste or Tribe status to constitute an offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act.
Allegations under the SC/ST Act require intentional insult or intimidation in public view; dismissal of revision upholds trial due to sufficient prima facie evidence.
Sufficient evidence must link alleged acts to an intent to humiliate based on caste identity for the application of the SC/ST Act.
An offence under the SC/ST Act requires evidence of caste-based abuse occurring in public view, which was not established in this case.
The court established that specific allegations under the SC/ST Act must be evident in initial complaints for charges to be actionable, and mere improvements in subsequent statements cannot justify f....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of the requisite mens rea to intentionally insult or intimidate a person of SC or ST to humiliate him within public view under Sect....
The court ruled that for an offence under the SC/ST Act, abuse must occur in public view, which was not established, leading to quashing of proceedings.
Mere allegations without evidence of public view do not constitute an offence under the SC/ST Act unless insults target caste identity in a public context.
The prosecution must prove intentional insult or intimidation based on caste to establish an offence under the Atrocity Act; mere membership of a Scheduled Caste is insufficient for conviction.
An acquittal by the trial Court carries a double presumption of innocence, and the appellate court should not disturb it unless there is a manifest error or perverse conclusion.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.