IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
AMJITH – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Crl. M.C. No. 8581 of 2024
Decided On : 11-11-2024
(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 528 - Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 - The accused sought to quash FIR and proceedings based on an ICC report declaring allegations false; however, the court held that the ICC report does not supersede police findings and the prosecution case is prima facie established. (Paras 3, 10, 14)
(B) Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) - The court emphasized that the ICC report is not the final word in criminal proceedings, especially when the victim's statement is not recorded, and the prosecution's case is supported by multiple witnesses. (Paras 10, 12, 14)
Facts of the case:
The accused, head of S.N College, allegedly made sexual remarks and demanded favors from the defacto complainant, leading to charges under IPC and Kerala Police Act.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the prosecution allegations were well made out, prima facie, and the ICC report could not quash the proceedings.
Issues: The main issue was whether the ICC report could quash criminal proceedings initiated by the police.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the ICC report does not have the authority to override police findings, especially when the victim's statement is absent from the report.
Result: Crl. M.C. dismissed.
ORDER :
1. This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNSS’ for short) by the accused in Crime No. 1099/2023 seeking to quash Annexures A1 FIR, A2 final report and the further proceedings in C.C. No. 944/2023 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court (Temp), Paravur against the petitioner.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor on admission. Perused the relevant documents.
3. The specific case of the prosecution is that the accused herein, who is the head of S.N College, and the Principal of the college made sexually coloured remarks and demanded sexual favour from the defacto complainant, repeatedly stating that “adichu tharatte” “adichu tharatte.” The further allegation is that he also asked the defacto complainant to be obedient to him so that issuance of memo, transfer and suspension against the defacto complainant could be avoided. Further he used to say defamatory allegations against her, during staff meetings and PTA meetings. On 21.08.2023 the accused started staff meeting at 3.30 p.m and continued the same beyond 5.30 p.m, and when the defacto complainant made her stand that she would not continue at the meeting after 5.30 p.m, he shouted towards her. This is the base on which prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Sections 354-A, 354-D and 509 of the Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’ for short) and Section 119(A) of the Kerala Police Act (‘K.P Act’ for short).
4. While canvassing quashment of the entire proceedings, the learned counsel for the petitioner gave heavy reliance on Annexure A3 report of enquiry conducted by the Internal Complaints Committee (‘ICC’ for short), on the basis of a complaint given by the defacto complainant, where it was found that the allegations are false. Therefore, the prosecution allegations are also false, is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. Whereas it is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that in Annexure A3 ICC report dated 12.02.2024, statement of the victim never recorded and a unilateral finding was entered into to the effect that the allegations are false. He also pointed out that going by the statement of the victim as well as the witnesses, who supported the prosecution allegations, the offences are made out, prima facie, and in such a case quashment could not be considered.
6. I have gone through the statement given by the defacto complainant and the specific allegation therein is that while the petitioner was holding the charge of Principal and Head of S.N college, he used to treat the defacto complainant badly and whenever he met the defacto complainant he used to ask her “adichu tharatte” “adichu tharatte” with the dual meaning, demanding sexual favour. In the additional statement of the defacto complainant, more instances were stated by the defacto complainant to the effect that she joined in Physics Department during 2022 and that when the accused met her at library and other places, he used to make unnecessary comments and he had grudge towards her since she resisted the same. The further allegation is that the Principal instructed her to reach the college at 8.30 a.m. during University exam time, who usually would reach the college at 9.30 a.m. but she expressed her willingness to reach the college only by 9 a.m as she anticipated indecent behaviour from the accused in the absence of other women teachers and employees therein. She also made a written complaint in this regard. Despite that the petitioner repeated the words extracted above with double meaning demanding sexual favour from her, despite having repeatedly made sexually coloured remarks. According to the defacto complainant, the accused continuously followed her and repeated the same and the same caused mental and physical sufferings to her. ‘XX’ (pseudo name), Assistant Professor, English Department working in the college from 2019 onwards;
AI
The ICC report does not supersede police findings in criminal proceedings, especially when the victim's statement is absent, and the prosecution's case is prima facie established.
The court ruled that prima facie allegations of sexual harassment were established, thus quashment of proceedings was not permissible.
The burden of proof in a criminal proceeding is different from that in a departmental proceeding. The court must treat complainants of sexual harassment and assault sensitively and ensure a fair tria....
The court affirmed that quashing of FIRs under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should only occur in rare cases where the allegations do not disclose a cognizable offence, emphasizing the need for evidence to sub....
The Nagaland State Commission for Women has the authority to investigate workplace harassment complaints and file reports, enabling criminal actions under relevant laws when evidence suggests. Both c....
Independent criminal proceedings for sexual harassment can be pursued despite internal complaint mechanisms existing under the POSH Act, provided they are substantiated and not motivated by malice.
Quashing of proceedings allowed when a private dispute is amicably settled between the parties.
The court established that a promise of marriage coupled with sexual intercourse can constitute grounds for prosecution under sexual offence laws, necessitating a trial.
Vague allegations of harassment do not constitute a prima facie case for prosecution under IPC Sections 354-A and 354-D, especially when supported by exonerating enquiry findings.
Quashment of criminal proceedings is not permissible if prima facie evidence exists to support allegations of sexual harassment and insulting modesty under relevant sections of IPC and KP Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.