Back
P. C Hary, S/o Late Parameswaran Namboodirippad – Appellant
Versus
Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioners, who are members of Puzhakkara Chennas Mana, the Tantri Family of Guruvayur Sree Krishna Temple, have filed this writ petition, invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 3, namely, the 1st respondent Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Committee, the 2nd respondent Administrator and the 3rd respondent Tantri to ensure the conduct of Udayasthamana Pooja in Guruvayur Sree Krishna Temple on Vrishchikam Ekadasi on the Shuklapaksham day of 1200ME (11.12.2024). The petitioners have also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to ensure that the religious custom, rituals, traditional rites, ceremonies, poojas, practice and usage in Guruvayur Sree Krishna Temple is not altered or caused to be altered and if any change is necessary the same can be effected only after conducting Ashtamangalya Prasnam in the traditional manner.
2. In the writ petition, it is stated that Guruvayur Ekadasi is one of the most important annual festivals observed in Guruvayur Sree Krishna Temple on the Shuklapaksham (full moon) day in Vrishchikam. It is be
The court ruled that the Udayasthamana Pooja's status as a religious practice must be established in civil court, and the Managing Committee's decisions regarding rituals are not subject to judicial ....
The court affirmed that the Tantri's decision is final in religious matters, allowing the Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee to shift the 'Illam Nira' ceremony venue without violating statutory p....
Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot adjudicate civil rights involving factual disputes; religious authority of the Tantri in Guruvayur Temple is final unless statutory provisions are violated.
Section 14 of Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act provides for Temple Advisory Committees and enjoins that composition of a Temple Advisory Committee shall be in such manner as may b....
The court ruled that a compromise decree is binding on parties involved, and a temple advisory committee cannot re-agitate settled issues regarding ritual performance and fund collection without appr....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the duty of the Travancore Devaswom Board to manage temple properties, perform traditional rites, and ensure compliance with statutory duties an....
Point of Law : Section 31A of Act deals with formation of Temple Advisory Committees.
The High Court refrained from granting any declaration as to who is the actual person who has a right to exercise the shebait rights or any other right relatable to the temple. The Court left open th....
Only the Temple Advisory Committee can conduct religious rites and collect contributions in temples managed by the Cochin Devaswom Board, as per statutory provisions.
The temple premises cannot be used for conducting mass drill or weaponry training. The Travancore Devaswom Board has the authority to manage the temple and arrange for the conduct of worship and fest....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
