Back
Babu, S/o. Sreedharan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash Annexure-B order, whereby the learned Ist Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram by invoking power under Section 216 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Cr.P.C') altered the charge and incorporated charge for the offence under Section 304 (B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'the IPC') also against the petitioner/accused adverting to the evidence tendered by the prosecution witnesses who were examined as PWs 1 to 17.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor in detail. Perused the order and the relevant provisions.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that in order to fasten criminal culpability upon a person, the ingredients stated under Section 304-B of IPC read with Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 shall be established by the prosecution. When a court alters charge by exercising power under Section 216 of Cr.P.C., the evidence relied on, for exercising the said power, must be convincing to find the ingredients for the offence, to which charge to be alt
The prosecution must prove the necessary ingredients for dowry death under Section 304-B IPC, including evidence of cruelty or harassment related to dowry demand, to justify altering charges.
The court upheld conviction for dowry death, emphasizing that evidence of torture and demand for dowry proven leads to presumption of causation under relevant legal provisions.
To sustain a conviction under Section 304B IPC, the prosecution must establish a proximate link between dowry-related cruelty and the victim's death within seven years of marriage, demonstrating that....
The court clarified that a conviction under Section 304B for dowry death does not substitute for a murder charge under Section 302, emphasizing the need for distinct evidence for each charge.
The court mandated that for a conviction under Section 304-B IPC, the prosecution must demonstrate a proximate link between cruelty and the death, which was found lacking in this case.
Simultaneous convictions under IPC sections for dowry death and murder require clear evidence for the latter; presumption of dowry death applies if cruelty is established prior to death.
Prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt in dowry death cases; lack of sufficient evidence to establish ongoing harassment led to acquittal.
(1) Dowry death – Courts should use their discretion to determine if period between cruelty or harassment and death of victim would come within term “soon before”. What is pivotal to such determinati....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
