A. BADHARUDEEN
Ajayakumar, S/O. Balakrishna Pillai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala Represented By The Public Prosecutor – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This is an appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure by accused Nos.1 and 2 in S.C.No.1317/2003 on the file of the IInd Additional Sessions Court, Kollam, assailing conviction and sentence imposed against them as per judgment dated 12.03.2007. State of Kerala represented by the Public Prosecutor is the respondent.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants as well as the learned Public Prosecutor in detail.
3. The prosecution case runs as under:
It is alleged by the prosecution that the 1st accused had married one Suja, the cousin sister of the defacto complainant, in accordance with the religious rites and customs prevalent in their community, on 6.2.1999. At the time of marriage, 35 sovereigns of gold ornaments had been given to Suja and a sum of Rs.2,50,000/-was promised to be paid as dowry within 2 years from the date of marriage. Subsequent to the marriage, the above Suja as well as the 1st accused were lived together as husband and wife in Balakrishna Vilasom Veedu, Veliyannoor Muri, Ummannoor Village, which is the family house of the 1st accused as well as the 2nd accused, who is the mother of the 1st accused. It is alleged further that
Baldev Singh v. State of Punjab
Baljeet Singh v. State of Haryana
K.Prema S.Rao v. Yadla Srinivasa Rao
Mangat Ram v. State of Haryana
Noor Aga v. State of Punjab & anr.
Rajeev Kumar v. State of Haryana
Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chattisgarh
Satbir Singh & anr. v. State of Haryana
Shersing alias Partapa v. State of Haryana
Shindo Alias Sawinder Kaur and another Vs. State of Punjab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.