IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J.
Sadhoo Beedi Enterprises Represented By Its Managning Partner Mr.Vinod P. P Kakkad – Appellant
Versus
The Controlling Authority Under The Payment Of Gratuity Act - Respondent
WP(C) No.36274 of 2024
Decided on : 04-12-2024
(A) Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 7(2), 7(3), 7(4)(b), 7(4)(c) - Gratuity payment - The employer is obligated to pay gratuity within 30 days of it becoming payable, and cannot pay in installments as it serves as a terminal benefit ensuring immediate financial support to the employee. Financial distress of the employer is not a valid excuse for delaying payment. (Paras 4, 5, 8)
(B) Writ Jurisdiction - The court cannot grant extensions for payment of gratuity beyond the statutory period as it undermines the purpose of the Act. (Paras 4, 5)
JUDGMENT :
The petitioner is an establishment covered under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', for short). The 2nd respondent employee, who retired from the establishment on 30.04.2017 on superannuation, submitted Ext.P1 application under Rule 10(1) of the Kerala Payment of Gratuity Rules, 1973, before the 1st respondent Controlling Authority, contending that the employer refused to pay the full gratuity due to him. The 1st respondent passed Ext.P2 order under Section 7(4) of the Act directing the petitioner to pay the 2nd respondent the balance gratuity amount of Rs.1,04,291/- with 10% interest from 19.05.2019 and interest at the rate of 10% per annum from 01.05.2017 to 18.05.2019 on Rs.1,14,291/- within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order. No appeal has been preferred against Ext.P2 under Section 7(7) of the Act. Since the amount ordered in Ext.P2 was not paid to the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent issued Ext.P3 show cause notice directing the petitioner to show cause why action should not be taken to recover the amount under Section 8 of the Act. To Ext.P3, the petitioner submitted Ext.P4 reply requesting to permit the petitioner to pay the amount ordered in Ext.P2 in 12 equal installments. The request of the petitioner was rejected by the 1st respondent by Ext.P5 communication and the petitioner was directed to pay the gratuity ordered in Ext.P2 within 7 days of receipt of Ext.P5. Challenging Exts.P3 and Ext.P5, the petitioner has preferred this writ petition.
2. As stated, Ext.P2 order of the 1st respondent has become final as the petitioner has not filed any appeal. Ext.P2 is not under challenge before this Court also. The 2nd respondent has not given any written consent to receive the gratuity in installments. It is submitted by the petitioner that the establishment is facing serious financial doldrums and it is not possible to pay gratuity to the 2nd respondent in lump sum.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent and the learned Government Pleader.
4. As per Section 7(2) of the Act, as soon as the gratuity becomes payable to an employee, the employer shall, whether an application has been made or not, determine the amount of gratuity. Section 7(3) provides that the employer shall arrange to pay the amount of gratuity, within 30 days from the date it becomes payable. Section 7(4)(b) provides that if there is any dispute as to the amount of gratuity payable to an employee under the Act or as to the admissibility of any claim for payment of gratuity, the employer or employee or any other person raising the dispute may make an application to the Controlling Authority for deciding the dispute. Section 7(4)(c) provides that the Controlling Authority shall determine the dispute and if amount is found payable to the employee, shall direct the employer to pay such amount or as the case may be, such amount as reduced by the amount already deposited by the employer. Ext.P2 is an order passed by the Controlling Authority under Section 7(4)(c). Since the petitioner did not pay the amount as ordered in Ext.P2, Ext.P3 show cause notice was issued. The petitioner submitted Ext.P4 reply requesting to permit the petitioner to pay the amount in 12 equal installments. The same was rejected by the 1st respondent by Ext.P5 on the ground that gratuity cannot be paid in installments. The relief prayed for in the writ petition is to allow the petitioner to make payment of the amount ordered in Ext.P2 in 12 installments.
5. The question to be considered in this writ petition is whether gratuity can be paid in installments. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Maniben Maganbhai Bhariya v. District Development Officer, Dahod and Others [2022 KHC 6461 : AIR 2022 SC 2119], while considering the object and scope of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, observed as follows:
Gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act must be paid in a lump sum within 30 days and cannot be paid in installments, regardless of the employer's financial situation.
Interpreting Act unequivocally indicate that payment of gratuity would not depend upon employee filing an application before employer demanding gratuity but will have to be paid immediately on cessat....
An employer must pay gratuity within 30 days and is liable for interest if delayed, regardless of an employee's application.
Interest under the Payment of Gratuity Act is due from the date of entitlement unless hindered by claim delays, resulting in dismissal of a petition for earlier interest claims.
Retired employees are entitled to full gratuity as per relevant statutes, including any excess from insurance schemes.
The central legal principle established is that gratuity, as a retirement benefit, must be determined and paid to eligible employees in a timely manner as mandated by The Payment of Gratuity Act, 197....
Employer must pay gratuity within 30 days of it becoming due, with interest chargeable after this period, regardless of employee application.
A party has the right to prove its claims in proceedings regarding the payment of gratuity, reinforcing the principles of natural justice.
Employer cannot withhold gratuity for unauthorized retention of quarters post-retirement; statutory interest of 10% applies for delayed payment.
Payment of gratuity capped by statutory limits cannot be overridden by administrative directives; interest claims on delayed payments are unsupported when full settlement acknowledged.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.