SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 1029

T. K. Johnson – Appellant
Versus
P. C. Mathew – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M. Balagovindan
For the Respondents: V.N. Kiran Lal, M.C. Ashi, Priyadarsan Thampi G.

JUDGMENT :

V.G. Arun, J.

1. Appellant is the complainant in S.T. No. 1070 of 2015 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Kollam. The complaint was filed against the 1st respondent, alleging commission of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The allegations in the complaint are to the following effect:

    The complainant and accused are close relatives. In the year 2011 the accused sought financial assistance from the complainant for the purpose of constructing a house boat. As the accused is a lose relative, the complainant agreed to provide financial assistance and accordingly paid Rs.30,00,000/- by way of cheque and cash. After receiving full amount, accused executed Ext.P1 agreement on 25.03.2013 acknowledging receipt of Rs.30,00,000/- from the complainant and agreeing to pay Rs.50,000/- per month to the complainant towards profit share from the house boat, till Rs.30,00,000/- is repaid in full. As the accused failed to comply with the terms of the agreement, the complainant caused a lawyer notice to be issued on 30.05.2015, demanding payment in terms of the agreement. On receipt of the notice, the accused approached the complainant on 14.06.2015 and iss

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top