IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
D. K. Singh, J.
Harish Kumar K.P. - Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India, Represented By Secretary To Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways, Transport Bhawan, 1, Parliament Street, New Delhi And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) Nos.7972 of 2024, WP(C) Nos. 421 of 2024, WP(C) Nos. 5010 of 2022, WP(C) Nos. 12832 of 2022, WP(C) Nos. 15698 of 2022, WP(C) Nos. 15705 of 2022, WP(C) Nos. 15891 of 2022, WP(C) Nos. 17965 of 2022, WP(C) Nos. 20644 of 2022, WP(C) Nos. 24215 of 2021, WP(C) Nos. 32249 of 2022, WP(C) Nos. 32375 of 2022, WP(C) Nos. 34988 of 2022, WP(C) Nos. 35048 of 2022, WP(C) Nos. 3187 of 2024, WP(C) Nos. 35879 of 2022, WP(C) Nos. 16833 of 2024
Decided On : 08-01-2025
(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 47 - Central Motor Vehicle (Twentieth Amendment) Rules 2021 and 2022 - Registration of vehicles under BH series - Petitioners, Central Government employees, sought registration under BH series, which was denied by State Authorities citing legislative competence - Court held that registration is within Central Government's domain under MV Act; the State can levy taxes per its laws. (Paras 2, 6, 16)
(B) Legislative Powers - Federal structure - Distribution of powers between Centre and States concerning motor vehicle taxation and registration - Central Government can prescribe principles of taxation; however, the rate of tax is exclusive to States. (Paras 10, 12, 15)
Facts of the case:
Petitioners, employees of Central Government and undertakings, challenged the refusal of the Transport Authorities in Kerala to register their vehicles under the BH series, arguing that the MV Act allows for such registration by the Centre. (Paras 2, 6)
Findings of Court:
Petitioners are eligible for BH series registration; the State must charge taxes per Kerala Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, 1976. (Paras 17, 17.1)
Issues: Whether the Central Government can prescribe tax rates for vehicles registered under the BH series and the authority of State in this regard. (Paras 10, 16)
Ratio Decidendi: The court clarified that while the Central Government can set principles for taxation, the actual rates fall under the jurisdiction of the State, reaffirming the federal structure of legislative powers. (Paras 15, 16)
Result: Writ petitions allowed; Transport authorities directed to register vehicles under BH series. (Paras 17, 17.1)
JUDGMENT :
D. K. Singh, J.
Heard Mr George Varghese, Mr Jaykar K S, Mr Satyendra Kumar Jha (party-in-person), Mr S Muhammed Haneeff, Mr K Shaj, Mr Peeyus A Kottam, Mr K J Manu Raj, Mr Thomas T Varghese, Ms Ambily Premkumar, and Mr T R Vishnu learned Counsel for the petitioners; Ms T S Krishna learned DSG and Mr Muhammed Rafiq learned Special Government Pleader (Taxes).
Facts:
2. The petitioners in these writ petitions are the Central Government employees and employees of the Central Government Undertakings, including the Banks. The petitioners are aggrieved by the non-registration of their new vehicles under the Bharat Series (BH series) in the State of Kerala by the Transport Authorities. Therefore, the petitioners have filed these writ petitions seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent State Authorities to register their vehicles under the BH Series.
3. The Central Government has taken a host of citizen-centric steps to facilitate mobility, including the introduction of a new registration mark for new vehicles, i.e., “Bharat Series (BH-series)”, to facilitate seamless transfer of vehicles. An IT-based solution for vehicle registration has been evolved to achieve the said purpose. However, to overcome the difficulty in the vehicles’ re-registration process while moving to another State, the vehicle owner is required to undergo some cumbersome process. Station relocation occurs with both Government and private sector employees. Such movements require a transfer of registration of their vehicles from the parent State to another State under Section 47 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 (for short, ‘MV Act’). Under Section 47 of the MV Act, a person is allowed to keep the vehicle for not more than 12 months in any State other than the State (parent State) where the vehicle is registered, but a new registration with the new State’s registering authority has to be made within the stipulated time of 12 months.
3.1 For the fresh/new registration in another State on the employee's movement, several steps are required, such as a No-Objection Certificate from the parent State for assignment of a new registration mark in another State, assignment of the new registration mark after the road tax on a pro-rata basis is paid in the new State, and application for refund of the road tax in the parent State on a pro-rata basis. The provision to get a refund from the parent State on a pro-rata basis is a very cumbersome process and varies from one State to another.
3.2 In order to facilitate seamless vehicle transfers, the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH), vide notification dated 26.08.2021, introduced a new registration mark for new vehicles, “Bharath Series (BH-series).” The vehicle bearing this registration mark shall not require the assignment of a new registration mark when the owner shifts from one State to another. This vehicle registration facility under the BH-series is available on a voluntary basis to Defense personnel, employees of the Central Government/ State Government/ Central or State Public Sector Undertakings and private sector companies/ organizations which have their offices in four or more State/Union territories. The motor vehicle tax will be levied for two years or in multiples of two. This Scheme is to facilitate the free movement of personal vehicles across States/UTs of India upon relocation to a new State/Union Territory. After completion of the fourteenth year, the motor vehicle tax shall be levied annually, which shall be half of the amount which was charged earlier for that vehicle as per notification No. GSR 594(E) 26.08.2021 - BH series registration mark Rules (MoRTH).
4. The Central Government, in the exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a), clause (d) and clause (p) of Section 64 of the MV Act, framed the Central Motor Vehicles (Twentieth Amendment) Rules 2021, effective from 15th September 2021. In Rules 48 and 50 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules 1989, a proviso and sub-rule (8) have be
The Central Government can prescribe principles for motor vehicle taxation, but the actual rates are within the exclusive domain of the States under the MV Act.
The Central Government can prescribe principles for vehicle taxation but lacks authority to set tax rates, which are within State jurisdiction.
Subordinate legislation cannot impose taxes unless explicitly authorized by the parent statute, reaffirming the supremacy of plenary legislation.
The tax imposed under Section 3A(3) of the 1972 Act is regulatory in character and is not a penalty.
Section 19 of the Constitution Amendment Act provided for a window period to the States to remove any inconsistent enactments by way of amendment or repeal or until expiration of one year from such c....
Motor Vehicle - Power/jurisdiction for assigning a new registration mark on a vehicle - Assignment of new registration mark but deem it proper to reiterate that if vehicle once registered in any Stat....
The court affirmed that tax paid by petitioners for transport vehicles up to 31.03.2015 in one successor state is valid in both states, prohibiting double taxation thereafter.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.