SANJAY KAROL, PARTHA SARTHY
Nirbhay Prashant, Advocate – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Partha Sarthy, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents through video conferencing.
2. The petitioner has filed the instant application by way of a public interest litigation for the following reliefs:
"a. to issue writ of Mandamus or any other writ, rule or direction to the Respondent no. 3 to ensure registration and insurance of vehicles about 925 of Patna Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'Corporation') which are using for the purpose of collecting garbage from its jurisdiction and may also direct Respondent authorities to ensure the collection of revenue loss caused by non- registration and non-insurance of the vehicles of the Corporation.
b. And may give any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled in law. "
3. The case of the petitioner in brief is that he came across a news article in the hindi daily newspaper namely, 'Dainik Bhaskar' on 29.3.2019 and 22.7.2019 which contained a news that the Municipal Corporation, Patna was operating its vehicle on road for collecting garbage without registration and insurance. Pursuant to the said news article, the petitioner filed a representation before th
Chief Settlement Commissioner, Punjab v. Om Prakash & Ors.
Director of Rationing versus Corporation of Calcutta (AIR 1960 SC 1355)
Lakshmi Chand v. Reliance General Insurance (2016) 3 SCC 100
Narinder Singh v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Swaran Singh (2004) 3 SCC 297
State of West Bengal versus Corporation of Calcutta AIR 1967 SC 997
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.