SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 79

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J.
Syamkumar @ Saji Viswamithran - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
CRL.A 68 OF 2019
Decided On : 14-01-2025

Advocates appeared:
FOR THE APPELLANT : Adv.SMT. JASMINE V.H.
FOR THE RESPONDENT: SRI.T.R.RENJITH, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The court modified the conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, emphasizing the lack of premeditation and the nature of the altercation.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 447 - Appeal against conviction for murder - Accused found guilty under Section 302 and sentenced to life imprisonment - Court modified conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304, Part I, due to lack of premeditation and the nature of the altercation - The incident arose from a sudden quarrel during a card game, leading to a single stab injury inflicted by the accused. (Paras 2, 24, 28)

(B) Evidence - Witness credibility - The court emphasized that minor discrepancies in witness testimonies do not undermine the overall credibility of their accounts, especially when witnesses are closely related to the victim. (Paras 20, 21)

(C) Delay in FIR - The court noted that while there was a delay in lodging the FIR, it was justified given the circumstances of the case, and did not invalidate the prosecution's case. (Paras 19)

Facts of the case:
The accused, a cousin of the deceased, was charged with murder after a fatal stabbing during a card game. The incident followed an altercation over cheating allegations. The deceased was rushed to the hospital but was declared dead upon arrival. (Paras 3, 4)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the accused acted in the heat of passion without premeditation, warranting a conviction under Section 304, Part I IPC instead of Section 302. (Paras 24, 28)

Issues: The main issues included whether the death was a result of homicide and the appropriateness of the conviction under Section 302 IPC. (Paras 11, 24)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the accused's actions fell under Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC, as the incident was a result of a sudden quarrel without premeditation. (Paras 25, 28)

Result: The appeal was allowed in part, modifying the conviction to Section 304, Part I IPC with a sentence of ten years' rigorous imprisonment. (Final decision)

J U D G M E N T

Raja Vijayaraghavan, J.

This appeal is preferred by the sole accused in S.C.No. 604 of 2012 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge-II, Pathanamthitta, challenging the finding of guilt, conviction, and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge.

2. The appellant, a man aged 24 years of age, was charged for having committed offence punishable under Sections 302, and 447 of the IPC. By the impugned judgment dated 20.06.2018, he was found guilty under Section 302 of the IPC and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1 lakh with a default clause.

The Prosecution Case

3. The deceased, Shibumon, was the son of one Sivaraman (PW8) and the elder brother of Shiju (PW7). The accused, Syamkumar @ Saji, is the maternal cousin of the deceased, being the son of the deceased's mother's sister. Sivaraman and PW3 had built a shed on a piece of property, where they were carrying out agricultural activities. On 07.04.2012, Suneesh (PW1) and the deceased were sitting in the shop of one Kalathil Sunil. The prosecution alleges that the accused called the deceased on his phone and invited him to the agricultural land, where PW3 and PW7 were engaged in guarding the crops from pests and animals. According to the prosecution, on receiving the call, the deceased along with PW1 and Murukesan (PW2) went to the shed. On the southeastern side of the shed, a bonfire was burning to keep wild animals at bay. There was also a shed, which was built by Sivaraman and PW3, where the deceased, the accused, and their friends sat and started playing cards. In the midst of the game, an altercation ensued between the accused and the deceased, as the accused felt that the deceased had tried to cheat in order to win the game. There was a wordy altercation between the accused and the deceased, and PWs 1 to 3, as well as PW7, had to intervene and separate them. After the incident, which occurred at about 9:00 P.M., the deceased stood up and decided to leave. He walked towards the eastern pathway. It is alleged that the accused, who was standing on the western side near the shed, abruptly went toward Shibu, who was walking, and took out a knife and inflicted a stab injury on his lower abdomen. After inflicting the injury, the accused took to his heels and disappeared into the darkness. Upon receiving the stab injury, the deceased clutched his abdomen with his palms and cried out. When he removed his palms, he fell to the ground. PW2 and PW3 took off their kailies and tied them around the injury. They then summoned the jeep driven by PW4 and rushed the injured to the hospital. The Doctor, after examining the injured, declared him dead.

Registration of Crime and Investigation

4. On 08/04/2012, 00.30 hrs. PW1 lodged the First Information Statement to PW17 who then was the Sub Inspector of the Thanithode Police Station. Based on the said information, Crime No. 40 of 2012 of Thannithodu Police Station was registered under section 302 of the IPC. The investigation was taken over by PW20, C.I. of Police, Konni Police Station on 08.04.2012. He conducted Ext.P2 inquest over the dead body of Shibu. Two saffron kailies which were found on the body were seized. After the conduct of the inquest, the body was handed over for autopsy. Ext.P4 Scene Mahazar was prepared and a yellow thread as well as a pair of sandals which were found at the scene of crime were seized. MO1 shirt of the injured, which was lying at the scene of the crime, was seized as per Ext.P6 Mahazar. He stated that the accused could be arrested only on 22.04.2012 at 7:30 p.m. After effecting arrest, MO5 shirt, which was worn by the accused at the time of the incident was seized. Based on the disclosure statement furnished by the accused, MO2 knife was seized from the house of one Kunjumol (PW10), a near relative of the deceased, as per Ext.P5 Mahazar. Though in the FIR, only Section 302 of the IPC was incorpo


            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top