A. K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, EASWARAN S.
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
SARASAMMA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Easwaran S., J.
These appeals have presented before us certain unique facts. On the one hand, the State as well as the requisitioning authority contend that the amount of compensation granted by the reference court is on the higher side, whereas on the other hand, the claimants contend that the amount fixed by the land acquisition officer is dismally low and it was therefore that the reference under Section 18 of the erstwhile Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was sought and the same was answered in their favour. The facts are unique in the sense that in respect of a single cause for land acquisition covered by one notification, land owners are differentiated on two different criteria;
(a) the award passed under the erstwhile Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and (b) the award passed under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 [Act 30 of 2013]. Different market values are fixed for the same category of lands acquired for the very same purpose albeit under two different enactments.
Facts of the case
2. A total extent of 105.27 hectares of land was sought to be acquired for establishment of a “Life Science Park” on requ
Asraf Ali Vs State of Haryana and ors (2013)5 SCC 527
Banarasi & Ors v. Ram Phal 2003 (9) SCC 606
Ravishankar Prakash Sarma v. State of UP (2019) 15 SCC 301
Nagpur Improvement Trust and another Vs Vithal Rao and other (1973)1 SCC 500
Landowners are entitled to equal compensation for lands acquired under the same notification, regardless of the act under which the acquisition is processed, ensuring compliance with constitutional r....
The court established that uniform compensation must be awarded for land acquired under different acts for the same purpose, to ensure equality and uphold rights to just compensation.
The court affirmed that previous awards in similar land acquisitions can be considered for determining market value under the Right to Fair Compensation Act, ensuring just compensation.
The court affirmed the necessity of just compensation in land acquisition cases, emphasizing adherence to statutory guidelines for market value determination and rehabilitation entitlements.
Market value of acquired land must reflect its potentiality and nature, with appropriate deductions for development costs applied.
The court clarified the authority's competence to re-determine compensation, the method for determining the average sale price, and the award of additional market value for structures under Act 30 of....
The court modified the market value of acquired land to Rs.780 per sq. yard, emphasizing the need for proper factual assessment and justification in land valuation under the Land Acquisition Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.