IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. Badharudeen, J.
Dr. V.K. Sulochana W/o. Dr. K.C. Viswanathan - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Kerala Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala - Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 2310 OF 2022
Decided On : 04-02-2025
ORDER :
This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to quash all further proceedings pursuant to Annexure.A1 Final Report in Crime No.884/2021 of Ollur Police Station, Thrissur, now pending as S.C. No.929/2021 on the files of the Special Court for the trial of cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act [hereinafter referred as ‘POCSO Act’ for short] (1st Additional District and Sessions Court), Thrissur. The petitioner herein is the 3rd accused in the above case.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor, in detail. Perused the Final Report and the decisions placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.
3. In this matter, the prosecution allegation is that, at about 13.30 hours on a day in the last week of January, 2021, the 1st accused trespassed upon the residence of the minor victim, aged 17 years and subjected her to sexual intercourse and as a result of the same, the minor victim became pregnant. On this premise, the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Sections 450 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 4(1) read with 3(a), 6(ii) read with 5(j)(ii) of the POCSO Act, as against the 1st accused.
4. The prosecution allegation against the petitioner, who is the 3rd accused and the mother of the victim, who the 2nd accused is that, they failed to report the crime to the Police as provided under Section 19 of the POCSO Act and thereby they committed the offence punishable under Section 21 read with 19(1) of the POCSO Act.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued to substantiate that the petitioner/3rd accused is absolutely innocent of the allegations and there was no deliberate omission on the part of the doctor to inform the crime to the Police. In this connection it is submitted that, as per the statement given by the victim, it was stated that, she met Dr.Indu M.R. of Aswini Hospital, Thrissur, when there was no menstruation for a period of five months and the doctor advised to do scan examination. On scan examination, it was found that the victim was four months pregnant and accordingly, she was directed to go to Government Medical College Hospital and treat accordingly. In tune with the statement given by the victim, the learned counsel read out the statement given by Dr.Indu M.R., Aswini Hospital, Thrissur. In the statement of Dr.Indu M.R., she stated that she attended the minor victim and found that the she was pregnant and accordingly, she was sent to Government Medical College Hospital, Thrissur, for further treatment. The doctor's statement would show further that, since she found the same as MLC, it was reported on 03.06.2021 and the CMO of the hospital forwarded the same on 04.06.2021 to the Police. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, in this matter, the FIR was registered on 04.06.2021 and the same would reveal that the First Information Statement of the victim was recorded while she was undergoing treatment at GEM Hospital, Thrissur, where the petitioner herein treated her. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the pregnancy of the victim was first noticed by Dr.Indu M.R. on 31.05.2021 and on noticing the pregnancy of the minor victim, the doctor reported the same as MLC on 03.06.2021 and the CMO of the hospital forwarded the same on 04.06.2021 to the Police and the FIR was registered on 04.06.2021 itself. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner further that, though Dr.Indu M.R. advised the minor victim to have further treatment at Government Medical College, Thrissur, the victim opted her treatment at GEM Hospital, Thrissur, when there occurred bleeding and for the first time the petitioner had occasion to meet the victim was only on 02.06.2021 and accordingly she was given treatment and the pregnancy got aborted, to save the life of the vic
Dr.Sr. Tessy Jose v. State of Kerala reported in 2018 (3) KLT 934 (SC)
Criminal liability under the POCSO Act requires a deliberate omission to report a crime, which was not established in this case.
Prompt and Proper Reporting – Prompt and proper reporting of the commission of offence under the POCSO Act is of utmost importance and its failure on coming to know about the commission of any offenc....
Failure to provide information about offence to Police – A person can be supposed to know only where there is a direct appeal to his senses – There is no obligation on this person to investigate and ....
The interpretation of 'knowledge' under Section 19(1) of the POCSO Act requires direct awareness of the offense, and a reasonable timeframe must be considered for reporting obligations, particularly ....
A doctor cannot be held criminally liable under the POCSO Act for failing to report a minor's pregnancy if the victim misrepresents her age as 18 years, and mere suspicion is insufficient for prosecu....
The court ruled that the obligation to report under the POCSO Act applies regardless of the accused's official capacity, and no sanction is needed for prosecution if the act is distinct from official....
The court ruled that a mother's delay in reporting her daughter's pregnancy, due to trauma, does not constitute a deliberate failure under the PoCSO Act, justifying quashment of proceedings against h....
Mandatory reporting of offences under the POCSO Act is crucial, and failure to report is punishable, emphasizing the seriousness of non-compliance.
Prompt and proper reporting of commission of offence under POCSO Act is of utmost importance – Non-reporting of sexual assault against a minor child despite knowledge is a serious crime and more ofte....
A one-day delay in reporting an offense under the PoCSO Act does not constitute willful omission, thus not attracting liability under Sections 19 and 21.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.