X – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By Public Prosecutor – Respondent
ORDER :
A. Badharudeen, J.
The petitioner in this Crl.MC is the 2nd accused in S.C.No.929 of 2021 on the files of Special Court under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 (for short ‘PoCSO Act’, hereinafter) Thrissur. The petitioner seeks quashment of the above proceedings by invoking power under Section 482 of the code of Criminal Procedure.
2. In this matter, the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under sections 4(1) r/w 3(a), 6(ii) r/w 5(j)(ii) of PoCSO Act and sections 540 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’ hereinafter) by the 1st accused, and offence under section 21 r/w 19(1) of PoCSO Act by the 2nd accused, who is the mother of the victim. In a nut shell the prosecution allegation is that when the victim aged 17 years felt abdominal pain and there was no menstruation for a period of five months, the 2nd accused, mother took her to XXX Hospital, XXX, and the Gynaecologist therein advised her to have scan examination doubting PCOD. On scan examination, it was found that the victim had completed 18 weeks of pregnancy and she was immediately referred to Government Medical College for further management. But the doctor fail
The court ruled that a mother's delay in reporting her daughter's pregnancy, due to trauma, does not constitute a deliberate failure under the PoCSO Act, justifying quashment of proceedings against h....
Failure to provide information about offence to Police – A person can be supposed to know only where there is a direct appeal to his senses – There is no obligation on this person to investigate and ....
Criminal liability under the POCSO Act requires a deliberate omission to report a crime, which was not established in this case.
Prompt and Proper Reporting – Prompt and proper reporting of the commission of offence under the POCSO Act is of utmost importance and its failure on coming to know about the commission of any offenc....
A one-day delay in reporting an offense under the PoCSO Act does not constitute willful omission, thus not attracting liability under Sections 19 and 21.
The court ruled that the obligation to report under the POCSO Act applies regardless of the accused's official capacity, and no sanction is needed for prosecution if the act is distinct from official....
A doctor cannot be held criminally liable under the POCSO Act for failing to report a minor's pregnancy if the victim misrepresents her age as 18 years, and mere suspicion is insufficient for prosecu....
Insufficient evidence to establish criminal liability under POCSO Act when both the accused and the witness had a duty to report, emphasizing the need for more than mere statements.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for evidence to implicate a person for an offence, emphasizing the need for grave suspicion and the interpretation of 'knowledge....
The POCSO Act does not require immediate reporting of offences; reasonable delay due to intervening circumstances does not constitute a failure under Sections 19 and 21(1).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.