SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 170

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SATHISH NINAN, SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JJ.
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax and Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Mohammed Salih and Ors. – Respondents
WA No. 1413 Of 2024
Decided On : 27-01-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Navaneeth N. Nath, CGC, Susie B. Varghese, Jose Joseph, SC, Income Tax Department, Kerala
For the Respondents: Gopikrishnan Nambiar M., K. John Mathai, Joson Manavalan, Kuryan Thomas, Paulose C. Abraham, Raja Kannan.

Cash in a bank account is considered 'property' liable for provisional attachment under Section 281B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 281B - Provisional attachment of property - Court held that cash in a bank account is 'property' liable to attachment under Section 281B - The term 'property' is not restricted to immovable property and encompasses money in bank accounts. (Paras 9, 10, 11, 12, 18)

(B) Provisional Attachment - The assessing officer must form an opinion based on tangible material regarding the necessity of provisional attachment to protect revenue interests. (Paras 15, 18)

Facts of the case:
The police seized Rs.1,56,00,000/- from respondents, which was released to them on bond. The Income Tax Department initiated proceedings for provisional attachment of their bank accounts due to potential tax evasion.

Findings of Court:
The court found that cash in bank accounts is attachable property under Section 281B, quashing the lower court's ruling to the contrary.

Issues: The main issues were whether cash in a bank account constitutes 'property' under Section 281B and the sufficiency of security provided to the Magistrate's Court.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the term 'property' in Section 281B is broad and includes bank deposits, emphasizing the need for provisional attachment to protect revenue interests.

Result: Writ appeals allowed; judgments impugned set aside.

JUDGMENT :

(Sathish Ninan, J.)

Is cash in a Bank account 'property' liable to attachment under Section 281B of the Income Tax Act, 1961(“the Act”)? On the discussions in this judgment we hold, 'Yes'.

2. On 12.04.2022, the police seized a huge amount of cash (Rs.1,56,00,000/-) from a car in which respondents 1 and 2 in the writ appeal were riding. The seized amount was produced before the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court.

3. On application by the Department under Section 132A of the Act, the Court directed release of the amount to the Department. Respondents 1 and 2 herein and others challenged the said order before this Court in Crl.M.C. Nos.5605/2022 and 5591/2022. This Court as per order dated 21.12.2023, directed release of the cash to them on furnishing a bond for the amount. The amount was accordingly released.

4. Upon investigation and being satisfied that there was no explanation for the cash nor was it accounted, and after recording reason to believe that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment, proceedings were initiated in relation to the same by the issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act.

5. Finding that the expected demand on assessment including penalty would be a substantial amount exceeding two crores, the payment of which the assessees would evade, the competent authority of the Department, ordered provisional attachment of the Bank accounts of the assessees as per Exts.P7 and P8 orders of attachment under Section 281B of the Act. The said orders were challenged in the writ petition. The writ petition was allowed, against which the Department is in appeal.

6. We have heard Sri.A.R.L. Sundaresan, Additional Solicitor General assisted by Sri.Navaneeth N. Nath, Standing Counsel-IT, for the appellants and Sri.P. Reghunathan, learned counsel for the respondents.

7. Allowing the writ petition and quashing the provisional order of attachment, the learned Single Judge held: -

    (i) Bank account is not a 'property' under Section 281B, which could be subjected to provisional attachment.

    (ii) The interest of the revenue stood secured by the security furnished before the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court.

    (iii) The records do not reveal that the opinion of the assessing officer and the approval granted by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(PCIT) to order provisional attachment was on due application of mind.

8. Section 281B of the Act reads thus: -

    “281B. (1) Where, during the pendency of any proceeding for the assessment of any income or for the assessment or reassessment of any income which has escaped assessment or for imposition of penalty under section 271 AAD where the amount or aggregate of amounts of penalty likely to be imposed under the said section exceeds two crore rupees, the Assessing Officer is of the opinion that of the purpose of protecting the interests of the revenue it is necessary so to do, he may, with the previous approval of the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner, Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, Principal Director General or Director General or Principal Director or Director, by order in writing, attach provisionally any property belonging to the assesee in the manner provided in the Second Schedule.

    (2) Every such provisional attachment shall cease to have effect after the expiry of a period of six months from the date of the order made under sub-section (1) :

    Provided that the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner, Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, Principal Director General or Director General or Principal Director or Director may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, extend the aforesaid period by such further period or periods as he thinks fit, so, however, that the total period of extension shall not in any case exceed two years or sixty days after the date of order of assessment or reassessment, whichever is later.

    (3) Where the assessee furnishes a guarantee from a scheduled bank for an amount not less than the fair

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top