IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MR. JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
Pampa Samyuktha Drivers Union - Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala - Respondent
WP(C) NO. 711 OF 2025
Decided On : 09-01-2025
(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 - Section 15A - Writ of mandamus sought to restrain interference with taxi operations in Nilakkal-Pamba area - Court held that contract carriage permits cannot be used for transportation of pilgrims during festival seasons due to legal restrictions. (Paras 3 , 9 , 10 , 14 )
(B) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 74 and 88(8) - Distinction between contract carriage and stage carriage - Court emphasized that a contract carriage must not pick up individual passengers en route, or it would be treated as a stage carriage, violating permit conditions. (Paras 51 , 52 , 63 )
(C) Legal duty - Court stated that a writ of mandamus cannot direct authorities to act contrary to statutory provisions. (Paras 59 , 60 , 62 )
Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a drivers' union, sought to operate contract carriages for free transportation of pilgrims from Nilakkal to Pamba, claiming it was necessary due to the plight of Sabarimala pilgrims.
Findings of Court:
The Court found that the operation of contract carriages under the Motor Vehicles Act for this purpose would contravene permit conditions and thus dismissed the petition.
Issues: The main issues addressed were the legality of operating contract carriages for pilgrimage transport and the distinction between contract and stage carriages.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that contract carriages cannot operate as stage carriages and reiterated that mandamus cannot be issued to contravene statutory provisions.
Result: Writ petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner, namely, Pamba Samyuktha Drivers Union, with registration No.PTM/TC/38/2022, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus restraining respondents 2 to 6 from interfering with or obstructing the Taxi Operators registered with Sub Regional Transport Office, Ranni from operating in accordance with their Contract Carriage Permits (Motor Cab Permits) in Nilakkal-Pamba area. The document marked as Ext.P1 is a communication dated 18.12.2021 of the 5th respondent Regional Transport Officer, Pathanamthitta to the Transport Commissioner, Kerala for sanctioning a taxi stand at Nilakkal, in case the 2nd respondent Travancore Devaswom Board takes a favourable decision, subject to the approval of this Court. The document marked as Ext.P2 is the reply dated 24.12.2021 of the Transport Commissioner, addressed to the petitioner, forwarding Ext.P1. The document marked as Ext.P3 is a letter dated 22.02.2022 of the concerned MLA to the Minister for Transport, Kerala. The documents marked as Exts.P5 to P8 are the check reports dated 02.01.2025 and 05.01.2025 issued against the taxi drivers, who are stated to be the members of the petitioner association.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Senior Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 3 to 6 and the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board for the 2nd respondent.
3. Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 enacted by the State Legislature makes provision for the administration, supervision and control of incorporated and unincorporated Devaswoms and of other Hindu Religious Endowments and Funds. Section 15A of the Act, inserted by Act 5 of 2007, with effect from 12.04.2007, deals with duties of the Board. As per Section 15A, it shall be the duty of the Board to perform the following functions, namely, (i) to see that the regular traditional rites and ceremonies according to the practice prevalent in the religious institutions are performed promptly; (ii) to monitor whether the administrative officials and employees and also the employees connected with religious rites are functioning properly; (iii) to ensure proper maintenance and upliftment of the Hindu religious institutions; (iv) to establish and maintain proper facilities in the temples for the devotees.
4. Sabarimala Sree Dharma Sastha Temple and Malikappuram Temple come under the Travancore Devaswom Board. Sabarimala is a prominent pilgrim centre in Kerala, where lakhs of pilgrims trek the rugged terrains of the Western Ghats to have darshan of Lord Ayyappa. Pamba Ganapathy Temple also comes under the Travancore Devaswom Board, which is a holy spot on the way from Pamba to Sannidanam, dedicated to Lord Ganesha, where the pilgrims offer prayer for safe trekking to Sannidanam. Sabarimala Sree Dharma Sastha Temple is situated inside Periyar Tiger Reserve. Sabarimala and its vicinity are a Special Security Zone under Section 83(1) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011, vide G.O.(Ms.)No.74/2024/Home dated 14.10.2024 issued by the State Government, in order to exercise the powers under Section 83(2) of the said Act, to ensure a safe, secure and hassle-free pilgrimage.
5. In Suo Motu v. Travancore Devaswom Board [2022 (7) KHC SN 5] this Court noticed that Sabarimala is situated in a difficult forest terrain prone to natural disasters. Unlike other temples in Kerala, Kerala Police is responsible for crowd management and maintenance of law and order in Sabarimala during festival seasons and monthly poojas. In temples like Guruvayur, where queue regulation is managed by the temple authorities, the online system can also be managed by them. However, in Sabarimala, crowd management during festival seasons is a challenging task, which is regulated by the Kerala Police. Their presence is even necessary at ‘Pathinettampadi’ to render necessary assistance to the devotees, especially children, senior citizens
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued to direct authorities to act contrary to statutory provisions, particularly regarding the operation of contract carriages as stage carriages.
The distinction between contract and stage carriages prevails, as any contract carriage used to pick up individual passengers is deemed a stage carriage, violating permit conditions.
Special area permits granted under a scheme formulated by the State Government can authorize public service vehicles to operate as contract carriages without violating statutory provisions.
Temple boards may regulate entry to sacred areas like Sopanam for safety and crowd management, even for special pooja ticket holders; not an essential religious practice.
Tourist Vehicles with All India Permits must operate as Contract Carriages, prohibiting them from functioning as Stage Carriages by picking up or dropping off passengers enroute.
‘Worshipper’ is a person who shows reverence and adoration for a deity - Right to worship is a civil right, of course in an accustomed manner and subject to the practise and tradition in each temple.
The Travancore Devaswom Board is obligated to ensure the uninterrupted performance of traditional rites and manage crowd safety during religious festivals, safeguarding the rights of worshippers.
Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 makes provision for administration, supervision and control of incorporated and unincorporated Devaswoms and of other Hindu Religious Endowmen....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.