IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SATHISH NINAN, SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JJ
Government Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
K.N.Venkateswaran S/o.Late K.V.Narayanan Iyer – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sathish Ninan, J.
The State is in appeal challenging the order of the Forest Tribunal, declaring the application schedule property as, not an 'ecologically fragile land' under the Kerala Forests (Vesting and Management of Ecologically Fragile Lands) Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as, “the EFL Act”), and for setting aside the EFL notification.
2. The application schedule property has an extent of 10.36 acres. It is situated in Re.Sy.Nos.578, 579, 588 and 590 of Vellamunda Village. In an earlier proceeding, the property was exempted from vesting under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as “the Vesting Act”). As on the appointed day under the EFL Act i.e., 02.06.2000, the property was planted with coffee, pepper, vanilla, etc., and hence, the property is not an ecologically fragile land, is the claim.
3. The State filed counter contending that the application schedule property is a thickly wooded area, with abundant growth of various species of forest trees. The contention that the property was planted with coffee, pepper, vanilla, etc., as on the date of appointed day, was denied. It was contended that the property predom
The court clarified that a property exempted under the Vesting Act may still be classified as ecologically fragile under the EFL Act, emphasizing the need for evidence of cultivation as of the appoin....
The EFL Act requires a nature assessment of land as of the appointed date, not merely the intent to cultivate, to determine ecological status.
The classification of land as 'ecologically fragile' under the EFL Act is upheld when sufficient evidence supports the environmental status, and co-sharers have standing to appeal.
The court upheld that property not principally covered by trees cannot be classified as forest under the EFL Act, rejecting the State's claim regarding ecologically fragile land.
Property not 'forest' under EFL Act if principally planted teak; inadequate inspection requires remand.
'Forest', which speaks of lands which are principally covered with naturally grown trees and undergrowth and includes any recognized, declared, protected or otherwise forest land.
Under EFL Act, applicant has to prove that land is principally cultivated with long duration crops or is a plantation, or beneficial enjoyment for a building, which alone can exclude it from definiti....
The State cannot assert a property as ecologically fragile if its inaction contributed to the property's condition, necessitating remand for further evidence.
The court affirmed that the property in question does not qualify as 'Ecologically Fragile Land' or 'Forest' under the Kerala Forest Act, based on the evidence presented.
The absence of trees in land classification negates its designation as ecologically fragile under the relevant Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.