Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
K.R.harikrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Sub Inspector Of Police North Parur Police Station – Respondent
ORDER :
Accused Nos.1 and 2 in C.C.No.1083/2016 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, North Paravur have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘Cr.PC’), to quash the proceedings against them. The offence alleged in the said case, where in the North Paravur Police filed the final report, are under Sections 420 and 120B I.P.C read with Section 34 I.P.C.
2. The case arose out of a complaint filed by the de facto complainant/second respondent before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, North Paravur with the following allegations:
3. Accused Nos.1 and 2 were introduced to the de facto complainant by the third accused, a friend of the de facto complainant’s husband, at a time when the de facto complainant and her husband were in dire need of an amount of Rs.12,50,000/- for meeting the expenses of the marriage of their daughter. Accused Nos.1 and 2 had agreed to advance the above amount to the de facto complainant if the property having an extent of 19.775 cents where the de facto complainant resides, is offered as security by executing a document in favour of the accused. It was agreed that the aforesaid docume
Criminal liability can arise from civil disputes; allegations of fraud and conspiracy must be examined despite ongoing civil litigation.
The court can exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Sec. 482 Cr.P.C to quash criminal proceedings if they amount to an abuse of the process of the court or if quashing the proceedings would serve ....
Criminal intent in property transactions leads to proceedings under IPC, regardless of parallel civil suits.
Fraudulent intent must be established for criminal liability in financial transactions, distinguishing between civil breaches of contract and criminal offenses like cheating.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that for an act to constitute an offence under Section 420 of the Penal Code, there must be fraudulent or dishonest inducement, and the absence ....
FIR is an abuse of process of law and/or the same has been lodged only to harass the accused, the same can be quashed in exercise of powers vested under Article 226 of the Constitution or in exercise....
The court affirmed that mere availability of civil remedies does not negate criminal liability, allowing the investigation to proceed based on sufficient prima facie allegations.
The court held that distinctions between civil and criminal transactions may not bar criminal proceedings when fraud or wrongdoing is alleged, requiring an investigation into the claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
