IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.Muhamed Mustaque, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ.
State of Kerala, Represented By Its Secretary, General Administration Department And Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Jayesh K And Ors. – Respondent
OP(KAT) Nos.14 of 2024, 47 of 2024, 51 of 2024, 70 of 2024, 87 of 2024, 93 of 2024, 95 of 2024, 115 of 2024, 123 of 2024, 124 of 2024, 132 of 2024, 276 of 2024, 304 of 2024, 343 of 2024, 354 of 2024
Decided On : 11-04-2025
(A) Kerala Administrative Service (KAS) Rules, 2018 - Rule 4 and Rule 9 - Cadre strength fixation - Candidates challenged the Government's fixation of cadre strength at 105, arguing it violated KAS Rules - Tribunal directed redetermination of cadre strength as per KAS Rules - Court found Government's fixation justified based on genuine reasons and statutory provisions. (Paras 1 , 2 , 18 , 21 )
(B) Appointment Authority's Discretion - The appointing authority has the discretion to decide not to fill vacancies for valid reasons, even with a valid rank list in force. (Paras 19 , 21 )
Facts of the case:
Candidates included in the rank list for KAS challenged the Government's order fixing cadre strength at 105, claiming it violated KAS Rules. The Tribunal directed a redetermination of cadre strength, which the Government contested.
Findings of Court:
The Government's fixation of cadre strength at 105 was justified based on statutory provisions and genuine reasons for not filling more vacancies. The Tribunal's order was set aside.
Issues: Whether the Government's fixation of cadre strength at 105 was in accordance with KAS Rules and whether the Tribunal's order directing appointments from an expired rank list was justified.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the appointing authority can decide not to fill vacancies for valid reasons, and the fixation of cadre strength must comply with statutory rules. The Tribunal's failure to consider the appointing authority's reasons was a significant error.
Result: Original petitions allowed; impugned orders set aside.
JUDGMENT :
P.Krishna Kumar, J.
The candidates included in the rank list for appointment in the Kerala Administrative Service (KAS) Junior Time Scale (Trainees) approached the Kerala Administrative Tribunal inter alia challenging Annexure A3 Government Order dated 06.02.2021 by which the cadre strength of KAS Officers (Junior Time Scale) was fixed at 105 by the Government. According to the candidates, the fixation of the cadre strength at 105 is in violation of the Kerala Administrative Service (KAS) Rules, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the KAS Rules’) and the actual figure is much higher.
2. By the impugned common order dated 13.10.2013, the Tribunal directed the Government to redetermine the cadre strength as on 01.10.2022 in accordance with the provisions contained in Rule 4 read with Rule 18 of the KAS Rules. The Tribunal further directed that the Government shall take steps to make appointments for the remaining vacancies as against the vacancies already reported to the Public Service Commission (PSC) pursuant to the interim direction of the Tribunal. Later, the Tribunal disposed of certain other similar applications based on the said impugned order. The above original petitions are preferred by the Government and the PSC against the said orders. As the matters to be determined in all these cases are closely connected, they are disposed of by this common judgment. For the sake of convenience, O.P.(KAT)No.14/2024 is considered as the leading case, in the following discussion.
3. On 01.11.2019, PSC invited applications for filling up ‘anticipated vacancies’ in the above post, as per Annexure A20 notification. Later, the PSC published Annexure A21 rank list with effect from 08.10.2021. The rank list was valid for one year.
4. A total number of 1258 posts were included in Table I of Schedule II in the KAS Rules. However, as per the Kerala Administrative Service (KAS) Amendment Rules, 2019 (‘Amendment Rules, 2019’, for short), the Government reduced the number of posts in the said Schedule to 1206. As per the Explanatory Note to the Amendment Rules, 2019 the said amendment was made to exclude certain posts that were inadvertently included in the KAS Rules. Later, the Government fixed the cadre strength of the KAS entry level at 105, which is under challenge before us.
5. We have heard the learned Standing Counsel for the Public Service Commission, the learned Senior Government Pleader and the learned counsel appearing for the party respondents.
6. Since the prime question involved in these cases concerns the actual cadre strength of the entry-level KAS post, it is appropriate to first examine the relevant rules. Rule 4 of the KAS Rules outlines the method of calculation of cadre strength. It reads :
“4. Cadre Strength:
(a) Entry Level: The cadre strength at the entry level in KAS shall be limited to 10% of the sanctioned strength of 2nd gazetted post in the departments and equivalent post in the common categories of posts in all departments as specified in Schedule I.
The 10% Gazetted posts so set apart shall include higher grade posts and posts on account of ratio promotions also.
Common category posts shall include the post of Administrative Officer, Administrative Assistant, Accounts Officer, Financial Assistant and posts earmarked for by transfer appointment through KPSC in the cadre of Financial Assistant.
(b) Senior Levels: Ten percent of all promotion posts in the promotion posts for the 2nd Gazetted Posts onwards in the Departments in Schedule I and promotion posts for the equivalent common categories of posts onwards in all departments that are specified in Schedule I, shall be set apart for promotions for officers in the KAS.
(c) Total Cadre Strength: The cadre strength of the KAS shall be computed as the sum of the posts of entry level and senior levels specified in Sub-Rule (a) and (b) above.
(d) Quinquennial Review of Cadre Strength: The review of cadre strength of the KAS shall be done once in five years or as and when deci
The appointing authority has discretion to not fill vacancies for valid reasons, even with a valid rank list, and must comply with statutory rules for cadre strength fixation.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of equal opportunity for public employment and the interpretation of selection rules in the context of ongoing and continuous re....
Point of Law : Recruitment over and above notified vacancies is not in accordance with constitutional mandate of equal opportunity of unemployment, envisaged in Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of ....
State or any public agency, cannot be precluded from challenging a judgment on the ground that it approaches this court, filing an appeal against only one party – Even if in that case, normative basi....
The autonomy and independence of Public Service Commissions in the selection process, and the authority of the Government to make recommendations to KPSC without binding KPSC to accept such recommend....
Candidates do not possess an indefeasible right to be appointed from a ranked list unless state authorities' actions are found arbitrary or unreasonable.
The autonomy of the KPSC in recruitment processes is upheld, but it must consider the Government's binding recommendations regarding vacancies, ensuring fair and transparent public employment.
The decision to not fill vacancies by KSEB was upheld as legitimate based on ongoing restructuring, emphasizing that candidates have no vested right to appointments from ranked lists under Article 22....
The supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 cannot alter findings of lower tribunals without clear manifest errors, particularly regarding vacancy reporting tied to expired lists.
Candidates included in a rank list have no indefeasible right to be appointed, and the state is not obligated to fill all vacancies. Candidates cannot claim a right to vacancies that are not reported....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.