IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar, Easwaran S., JJ.
Indian Medical Association, Kerala State Branch – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Represented by The Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi and Ors. – Respondents
W.A.No.1659 of 2024, W.A.No.1487 of 2024, W.A.No.468 of 2025
Decided On : 11-04-2025
(A) Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Sections 2(17)(e) and 7(1)(aa) - Kerala Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Sections 2(17)(e) and 7(1)(aa) - Constitutional validity - Writ petition by the Indian Medical Association challenging the applicability of GST on services rendered to its members based on the principle of mutuality - The court found that the amendments to the GST Act removing the principle of mutuality were unconstitutional and void, infringing Articles 246A and 366(12A) of the Constitution. (Paras 11 - 24 )
(B) Taxation - Principle of mutuality - The court reaffirmed that the principle of mutuality, which states that a club and its members are one and the same, continues to apply, and thus, services provided by a club to its members cannot be taxed under GST. (Paras 11 - 23 )
(C) Retrospective operation of tax laws - The court held that retrospective amendments imposing tax liabilities without prior notice violate the principle of fairness and the rule of law. (Paras 24 )
Facts of the case:
The Indian Medical Association challenged the GST applicability on services provided to its members, arguing that the principle of mutuality exempted them from such taxation. The amendments to the GST Act were claimed to be unconstitutional.
Findings of Court:
The court declared the amendments unconstitutional, reaffirming the principle of mutuality and the illegality of retrospective tax imposition.
Issues: The main issues were the constitutionality of the GST amendments and the applicability of the principle of mutuality in tax law.
Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the amendments undermined established legal principles and imposed unfair retrospective liabilities, violating constitutional provisions.
Result: Writ Appeal No. 1659 of 2024 allowed; Writ Appeals No. 1487 of 2024 and No. 468 of 2025 dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.
These Writ Appeals, one preferred by the petitioner in W.P. (C).No.21297 of 2023 and the other two preferred by the GST Officials of the Union and the Kerala State, impugn the judgment dated 23.07.2024 of a learned Single Judge in W.P.(C).No.21297 of 2023.
The Facts in Brief:
2. The essential facts necessary for disposal of these Writ Appeals are as follows:
W.P.(C).No.21297 of 2023 was preferred by the Kerala State Branch of the Indian Medical Association apprehending coercive action from the Directorate General of GST Intelligence for recovery of tax on various services rendered by it to its members. While it was the petitioner's contention that it was not liable to pay tax on the supply of services to its members, it apprehended coercive action for recovery of tax when it was served with summons requiring it to produce details of the registration taken by it under the GST Act and their audited books of accounts and other financial documents for the financial years from 2017-18 to 2021-22.
3. The petitioner runs various mutual Schemes for the benefit of its member-doctors, e.g. Social Security Schemes or SSS (I, II, and III), Professional Disability Support Scheme (PDSS), Professional Protection Scheme, Kerala Health Scheme, etc. All the Schemes are to support fellow doctors, while one or two Schemes support their immediate family members. The member-doctors contribute an admission/annual fee, and in cases of certain Schemes (e.g. SSS, PDSS) also a fraternity contribution upon the death/disability of a fellow member doctor; the pooled sum is paid out to the widow of deceased doctors, disabled doctors, doctors afflicted with specified diseases, etc. Each Scheme is run by a separately elected committee, in which the Secretary and President of the petitioner are ex officio members. The Schemes have separate bank accounts, and accounts of each Scheme are drawn up and separately audited. A brief description of the Schemes is as given below:
“Social Security Schemes
i) Objects: The objects of the schemes are to provide financial assistance to the families of the medical practitioner in the event of his or her death, or in the event of a member suffering permanent disability that renders the member unfit to practice the profession for life. The objects also encompass undertaking various charitable/philanthropic activities such as providing medical aid to the needy and poor, family welfare programmes independently/jointly with the Government, organising blood donation camps, eye camps, promoting medical education, etc.
ii) Payment: Any doctor who is a member of the petitioner may become a member of these Social Security Schemes upon payment of an admission fee which is graded depending upon the age of the doctor. The member is then required to pay an annual subscription of Rs.300 to Rs.1,000 for a period of 20 to 25 years.
iii) Death/Permanent disability: Upon the death/permanent disability of a member, every other member of that scheme is to pay a specified “fraternity contribution” ranging from Rs.100 to Rs.500 depending upon the number of years for which the deceased member had been a member of the scheme. The fraternity contribution (calculated as a product of the individual fraternity contribution and the net membership of scheme concerned, subject to a maximum specified under the bye-laws) is handed over to the family of the deceased/permanently disabled member and the remaining portion, if any, is credited to the corpus of the scheme concerned to be paid out in future.
Professional Disability Support Scheme
i) Object: The object of the scheme is to provide financial assistance to a member of the scheme who has become so temporarily / permanently disabled that it renders him unfit topractice her / his profession.
ii) Payment: Any eligible member of the petitioner may become a member of this scheme upon payment of an admission fee that is graded based on age (Rs.5,000/- to Rs.15,000)/-. An annual fee
AI
The principle of mutuality exempts clubs from GST on services provided to members; amendments to tax laws undermining this principle are unconstitutional.
The amendments to the Central and Kerala GST Acts that retrospectively impose taxes on services rendered by clubs to members violate the principle of mutuality, rendering them unconstitutional.
Incorporated members' clubs are not subject to service tax under mutuality principles; service tax demand against the appellant based on erroneous distinction from P&I Club rejected.
The supply of goods by a club to its members is not a sale as it lacks ownership transfer; clubs act as agents for their members.
Incorporated associations are exempt from service tax due to the mutuality principle, as they do not engage in commercial transactions with their members.
Section 19 of the Constitution (101st Amendment) Act preserves existing laws but does not confer unrestricted authority to amend post-GST transition, resulting in the invalidation of later amendments....
Section 19 of the Constitution Amendment Act provided for a window period to the States to remove any inconsistent enactments by way of amendment or repeal or until expiration of one year from such c....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.