SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 673

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J.
Jaseena K.U. - Appellant 
Versus 
Mahatma Gandhi University - Respondents 
WP(C) NO. 3728 OF 2024
Decided on : 19-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : BY ADVS. P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) K.SUDHINKUMAR SABU PULLAN GOKUL D. SUDHAKARAN R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN BHARATH MOHAN K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.)
For the Respondent: BY ADV. SRI. SURIN GEORGE IPE

IMPORTANT POINT
Lecturers who meet eligibility criteria for promotion must be granted placement in Selection Grade, regardless of subsequent pay revision orders.

Headnote:

(A) UGC Notification on Revision of Pay Scales, 1998 - Placement of Lecturers in Selection Grade - Petitioners, after completing requisite service, sought placement as Lecturer (Selection Grade) based on 5th UGC Pay Revision Order - University rejected proposal citing 6th Pay Revision Order - Court found petitioners eligible for placement prior to 17.09.2010 as per Ext.P6 GO - Delay in submission of proposals not significant due to prior litigations. (Paras 1 - 16 )

(B) Eligibility for Promotion - Lecturers in Senior Scale can be placed in Selection Grade after five years of service - Court emphasized that similarly situated individuals should receive equal treatment. (Paras 6 , 16 )

Facts of the case:

Petitioners appointed as Lecturers between 1996 and 1999, promoted to Senior Scale after six years, and became eligible for Selection Grade placement by 2010. Their requests were denied by the University despite similar cases being approved.

Findings of Court:

The petitioners are entitled to placement in Lecturer (Selection Grade) effective from the dates mentioned in their placement orders, with all consequential benefits.

Issues: Whether the petitioners were eligible for placement in Selection Grade under the 5th UGC Pay Revision despite the 6th Pay Revision Order.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioners were eligible for placement as they met the criteria prior to the cutoff date, and the delay in proposal submission was justified due to previous litigations.

Result: Writ petition disposed of in favor of petitioners.

JUDGMENT :

(N. NAGARESH, J.)

The petitioners, who are working as Assistant Professor Grade II / Lecturer (Senior Scale) in the MES College, Marampilly, Aluva, seek to quash Ext.P7 communication of the 2nd respondent and to direct the 2nd respondent to approve the placement of the petitioners as Lecturer (Selection Grade) with effect from the dates mentioned in Exts.P3, P4 and P5 with consequential benefits.

2. Petitioners 1 to 3 were appointed as Lecturers on 17.10.1996, 22.03.1999 and 24.03.1999 respectively. The petitioners possess B.Tech Degree in Computer Science and Electronics. The petitioners acquired M.Tech Degree in June, 2011. After completing six years of service, the petitioners were promoted as Lecturer (Senior Scale) as per the 5th UGC Pay Revision Order with effect from 17.10.2002, 22.03.2005 and 24.03.2005 respectively.

3. The petitioners state that as per Ext.P1 UGC Notification on Revision of Pay Scales, Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers in Universities and Colleges and other Measures for the Maintenance of Standards, 1998, Lecturers in Senior Scale will be placed in the Selection Grade subject to the recommendations of the Selection Committee. The Lecturers (Selection Grade) can offer themselves for fresh assessment after obtaining PhD and/or fulfilling other requirements for promotion as Reader and, if found suitable, could be given the designation of Reader. As per Clause 7.4.1 of Ext.P1, a Lecturer (Senior Scale) who has completed five years of service can be placed as Lecturer (Selection Grade).

4. The petitioners state that they completed five years of service as Lecturers (Senior Scale) on 17.10.2007, 22.03.2010 and 24.03.2010 respectively and became eligible for placement as Lecturer (Selection Grade). Later, pursuant to Ext.P2 judgment in W.P.(C) No.32981/2014, the petitioners were placed as Lecturer (Senior Scale), as per Exts.P3 to P5 placement orders issued in the year 2007 and 2010.

5. In the meanwhile, UGC 6th Pay Revision Order came into force whereunder there is no Senior Scale or Selection Grade. The 6th Pay Revision provided for Assistant Professor Grade-I, Grade-II and Grade-III. The 6th Pay Revision came into force as per GO dated 27.03.2010. The Government later issued Ext.P6 GO dated 10.12.2010 holding that Lecturers, who are eligible for placement in Selection Grade prior to 17.09.2010, can claim the benefits of 5th Pay Revision. Therefore, the petitioners are eligible for placement in Selection Grade on 17.10.2007, 22.03.2010 and 24.03.2010.

6. When the placement orders of the petitioners in Selection Grade were forwarded to the University, the University rejected the same holding that they are now governed by 6th Pay Revision Order and subsequent 7th Pay Revision Order.

7. The petitioners state that similarly placed Lecturers were granted placement under Selection Grade and such grant was approved by the University, as can be seen from Ext.P8 order granting placement to one Sri. Murugan. One Sri. Joseph Deril K.S. was granted the benefit as per Ext.P9 order. There are a number of Associate Professors who are given placement as Lecturer (Selection Grade) since they became eligible for the said placement prior to 17.09.2010. The petitioners' request was, however, rejected.

8. The 1st respondent resisted the writ petition filing a statement dated 25.02.2025. The 1st respondent stated that the Principal of the petitioners' College submitted the proposal for placement of the petitioners in Lecturer (Selection Grade) on 13.06.2023. The service records of the petitioners were submitted to the University on 24.08.2023. On verification of service records, it was noted that the Deputy Director of Collegiate Education has revised the pay and the designation of the petitioners as per the 6th UGC Pay Revision based on the form of option submitted by the petitioners. The petitioners were required to resubmit the fixation statement and other required documents with the pay and designation as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top