IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH, J
Manu – Appellant
Versus
Sree Sankaracharya University Of Sanskrit – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N.NAGARESH, J.
The petitioner, who is working as Professor and Head of the Department (Hindi), Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, seeks to set aside Exts.P2, P4 and P12 and to direct respondents 1 and 2 to modify Ext.P7 order by giving placement to the petitioner as Professor with effect from 01.06.2009.
2. The petitioner states that prior to the year 1999, the petitioner had ten years and six months of service in the Mahatma Gandhi University. The petitioner joined the 1st respondent-Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit on 14.07.1999. On 01.11.2022, the petitioner joined the 4th respondent-Central University of Kerala.
3. The petitioner requested the 1st respondent- University to count his past service for service benefits. Considering his past service, the 1st respondent found that the petitioner is eligible to the post of Selection Grade Lecturer with effect from 22.12.2000. The petitioner was placed as Selection Grade Lecturer with effect from 14.07.2000 granting notional selection post with effect from 22.12.1999. The petitioner was informed that he cannot be placed as Professor as he has not secured requisite score. The petitioner was, however, placed as Ass
Eligibility for promotion in academic institutions requires compliance with specific UGC criteria, including submission of a satisfactory Self-Assessment Report and recognized publications.
power of the Government to make laws determining the service conditions of its employees or amend such laws cannot confer them the power to apply such laws differently to similarly situated persons.
The judgment established the principle that ad hoc service is eligible for counting under UGC Regulations for promotion and emphasized the requirement for authorities to provide substantive reasons f....
Previous regular service in academic positions must be considered for promotion under the Career Advancement Scheme, and universities cannot unjustly require specific documents from prior employment.
The court upheld the University's decision not to count prior service as Academic Consultants for promotion under the Career Advancement Scheme, affirming compliance with UGC regulations.
Promotion eligibility under UGC regulations must be honored, and government financial concerns cannot unjustly hinder rightful promotions.
Lecturers who meet eligibility criteria for promotion must be granted placement in Selection Grade, regardless of subsequent pay revision orders.
Past services of a professor can be counted for promotion under UGC regulations, regardless of whether the previous pay scale was higher than UGC standards.
Past service in temporary roles can be counted for promotion under Career Advancement Scheme, aligning with UGC regulations; denial of such benefits violates legal rights.
Past services in private institutions must be counted for Career Advancement Scheme eligibility, and subsequent Executive Councils cannot revoke earlier decisions without lawful basis.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.