Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J.
Chelattubhagom Nair Karayogam, Trichattukulam P.O. – Appellant
Versus
Kavukutty Amma Ammukutty Amma *(Died, Lhrs Impleaded) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This Regular Second Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Subordinate Judge's Court, Cherthala, in A.S.No.73/1998, which arose from the judgment and decree passed by the Munsiff's Court, Cherthala in O.S.No.869/1991. The defendants are the appellants.
2. The facts giving rise to the appeal are the following:
2.1. The plaint schedule property is 10 cents of land, which was the subject matter of O.A 300/1970 before the Land Tribunal.This property originally belonged to defendant No.1-Karayogam.
2.2. The plaintiff pleaded the following:
The plaintiff has been in possession of the plaint schedule property. She has been enjoying the property for the last 20 years. With the enactment of the Land Reforms Act, the plaintiff filed a petition as O.A No.300/1970 before the Land Tribunal. The Tribunal ordered to issue a purchase certificate in respect of 10 cents of land in favour of the plaintiff. When the competent authority visited the plaint schedule property to measure out it, the office bearers of defendant No.1-Karayogam requested the plaintiff to satisfy with six cents. They also represented to the plaintiff that the title of the remaining extent of the
A person in settled possession is entitled to protect their possession against even the true owner, regardless of title.
A person in peaceful and settled possession is entitled to protection against dispossession without due process, even from the rightful owner.
A person in settled possession is protected against forcible dispossession by the true owner without legal recourse, even if the title is disputed.
The burden of proof lies on the party asserting possession, and failure to establish title and possession results in dismissal of the claim.
Possession claims must be substantiated with specific evidence of ownership and cannot rely solely on assertions without proper pleadings.
A party claiming property possession must substantiate their claims with credible evidence; failing to do so results in dismissal of claims.
A caretaker cannot acquire rights to property solely through long possession; valid rental or license agreements are necessary for legal protection.
In actions for injunctions, plaintiffs must demonstrate lawful possession and seek a declaration of title when ownership is disputed; failure to do so renders the suit unmaintainable.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
