Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. JUSTICE P.M.MANOJ, J
Reni.m – Appellant
Versus
Kerala Agricultural University – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The writ petition is preferred challenging Ext.P14 order passed by the respondent University in compliance with the direction in Ext. P13 judgment.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that by Notification No.GA/K1/21606/07 dated 24.09.2007, the University invited applications for appointments to the post of various disciplines. That Notification was later modified by notification dated 09.10.2007 and 15.11.2007 by the University. Due to some technical issues and consequent litigations, finally Ext.P1 rank list was published. Petitioner was included as Serial No.9. The rank list was for the post of Assistant Professor in the discipline Horticulture under the faculty of Agriculture. At that point of time, three vacancies were available. However, in the Notification itself it was clarified that the same will be subject to variation. The rank list came into force on 30.07.2009, which was valid for two years and expired on 29.07.2011.
3. According to the petitioner, 7 persons were appointed from Ext.P1. The Executive Committee of the University on 17.04.2010 resolved to fill up the vacancies of Associate Professors and Professors. At that point of time, one Associate Professor,
The court affirmed that the expiration of a rank list does not negate the right to appointment when vacancies exist, emphasizing the binding nature of prior judgments.
Court held that prior judgments regarding appointments must respect factual vacancy determinations, affirming adherence to statutory rules in the context of appointment procedures.
The expiration of a rank list precludes claims for appointment unless vacancies exist and are available for filling.
The obligation of the University, as an entity under Article 12 of the Constitution of India, to adhere to the principle of fairness in action and give preference to candidates from the current rank ....
The court established that provisions for creating rank lists and communal rotation can operate simultaneously, ensuring fair appointment practices in accordance with statutory mandates.
Rule 17A indicates that under this Rule special recruitment can be done from among Scheduled Castes and Schedule Tribes when they are not adequately represented in any service, class, category or gra....
Point of Law : Recruitment over and above notified vacancies is not in accordance with constitutional mandate of equal opportunity of unemployment, envisaged in Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of ....
The court upheld the University's compliance to the original recruitment notification and the relevance of the positions in light of changing circumstances.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
