Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.
Vishnudev K. – Appellant
Versus
High Court Of Kerala, Represented By The Registrar General, High Court Of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of writs due to appointments denied (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. administrative decisions leading to vacancies (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. counterarguments regarding claims for appointments (Para 6 , 9) |
| 4. legal precedents about rank list rights (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. court's caution on policy decisions (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. government authority in staff pattern changes (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. limitations on claims after rank list expiry (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. writ petitions dismissed due to lack of justifiable reason (Para 21) |
JUDGMENT :
All these writ petitions are filed by the respective petitioners, being aggrieved by the denial of appointments to them, by the 1st respondent as Office Attendants, despite the fact that, they were included in the ranked list published in this regard. It is also their grievance that, without giving them appointment, now a fresh selection process is notified for the said post. (WP(C)No. 23548/2024 is treated as the leading case and the Exhibits and the parties will be hereinafter referred to in this judgment as per the description and sequence thereof in the said writ petition)
The 2nd respondent published Ext.P1 notification dated 19.12.2019, inviting appli
Inclusion in a ranked list does not confer an indefeasible right to appointment; policy decisions regarding the creation and abolition of posts are within the government’s discretion unless proven ar....
Point of Law : Recruitment over and above notified vacancies is not in accordance with constitutional mandate of equal opportunity of unemployment, envisaged in Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of equal opportunity for public employment and the interpretation of selection rules in the context of ongoing and continuous re....
Vacancies arising during the validity of a rank list should be filled from that list without new recruitment, subject to necessary approvals.
Point of law: Recruitment - duty of the Public Service Commission is to make available to the Government a complete list of qualified candidates arranged in order of merit. Thereafter the Government ....
The court affirmed that the expiration of a rank list does not negate the right to appointment when vacancies exist, emphasizing the binding nature of prior judgments.
(1) Appointments cannot be made over and above clear and anticipated vacancies which have been advertised even though Public Service Commission may have prepared a longer merit list than it was requi....
The petitioner's claim for appointment on the post of JLO from the reserved waiting list was found to be valid as he approached the Court before the expiry of the wait list, and the Court allowed the....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
