SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 951

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
VIJAYAN D. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR, ASG OF INDIA, SRI.N.S.DAYA SINDHU SHREE HARI

JUDGMENT :

1. These petitions have been filed by the petitioners, who are stated to have retired from the CRPF/BSF claiming the benefits available under the ACP Scheme/MACP Scheme.

2. Heard the Sri.Mathew Kuriakose, the learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(C).No. 26275 of 2019 and Sri.Nirmal V.Nair, the learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(C).Nos. 28515 and 26319 of 2019. I have also heard Sri.N.S.Dayasindhu Sreehari, Sri.P.Krishnadas Nair and Smt.Mini Gopinath on behalf of the respondents here.

3. The petitioners contend that they are entitled to get the MACP benefits with reference to a series of judgments issued by the Delhi High Court. However, the learned Central Government Counsel would point out that, though the SLPs preferred from the judgments produced in the writ petitions have been rejected, in a subsequent set of cases, the Hon’ble Apex Court has considered the entitlement qua the similarly placed persons like the petitioners herein, deciding the issue in favor of the Government.

4. At the same time, it is pointed out by Sri.Nirmal V.Nair that the consideration made by the Delhi High Court as well as the Hon’ble Apex Court was with reference to the entitlements

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top