IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Ramdular Singh - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P. (C) 479 of 2021
Decided On : 13-01-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. entitlement to 2nd macp and arrears. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. reference to prior decisions and pending cases. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. coverage of current petition by prior decision. (Para 7) |
| 4. specific directives regarding macp and arrears. (Para 8) |
| 5. order will follow supreme court's judgment. (Para 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)
C.M.No.1235/2021
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) No.479/2021
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondent No. 2 to 5 to give the benefit of the 2nd MACP to the Petitioner No.1 to 6 in the pay scale of Sub Inspector @ Rs.9300-34800/- with Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- upon completion of 20 years of regular service with the CRPF, from their respective due dates of year 2005 by treating the MACP as applicable since 1st January 2006 onwards.
2. Petitioners further pray for a direction to the respondents to pay the arrears in the above terms after rectification of their pay scale along with consequential arrears arising therefrom.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by this Court in W.P. (C) No.8203/2019 in Ex. HC/GD Prahalad vs. Union of India and Ors. vide order dated 13th September, 2019, as modified by order dated 18th September, 2019.
4. Issue notice.
5. Ms. Talish, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. She states that a number of special leave petitions are pending consideration before the Supreme Court on the same issue.
6. In rejoinder, learned counsel for the petitioners states that no SLP is pending against the judgment and order in Ex. HC/GD Prahalad (supra), W.P.(C) No.8203/2019 before the Apex Court.
7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the prayer in the present petition stands covered by the decision dated 13th September, 2019, as modified by order dated 18th September, 2019, of this Court in W.P.(C) 8203/2019 (Ex.HC/GD Prahalad v. Union of India and batch).
8. Accordingly, the present writ petition is allowed with the following directions:
(i) The benefit of the 2nd MACP will be given from the date of completion of 20 years of service by treating the MACP scheme as applicable with effect from 1st January 2006 onwards;
(ii) The petitioners will be placed in the appropriate pay scale of SI/HC etc. as the case may be (for eg. In the case of SIs Rs.9300-34800 with grade pay of 4200) from the date of completion of 20 years of regular service;
(iii) The appropriate orders will be issued and the arrears will be paid to the petitioners within a period of 12 weeks, failing which the respondents would be liable to simple interest at 6% per annum on the arrears for the period of delay.
9. Needless to state that the present order will abide by the judgment and order to be passed by the Supreme Court in the pending SLPs, if any, on the same issue.
10. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.
The court affirmed that entitled benefits under the MACP scheme should be granted retroactively from the completion of service, emphasizing adherence to prior judgments and liable interest for delaye....
Employees are entitled to 2nd MACP benefits after 20 years of service, with decisions referencing prior cases upheld, ensuring timely payment of benefits and adherence to established judicial precede....
The court ruled that the petitioner is entitled to the benefits of the 2nd MACP scheme, impacted from a specific date, following an authoritative precedent.
The court directed the application of the 2nd MACP from 01st January 2006 based on precedents, ensuring correct pay scale alignment for the petitioner after 20 years of service.
Prior judgments govern subsequent related claims, mandating adherence to previous decisions regarding entitlements under the MACP scheme.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioners to the benefit of the 2nd MACP scheme from the date of completion of 20 years of service, as well as the obligat....
The Court directed timely resolution of benefits claims, highlighting the importance of correct rank hierarchy in service law.
The court's decision was influenced by a previous decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court on the same issue.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.