Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Ramdular Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. entitlement to 2nd macp and arrears. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. reference to prior decisions and pending cases. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. coverage of current petition by prior decision. (Para 7) |
| 4. specific directives regarding macp and arrears. (Para 8) |
| 5. order will follow supreme court's judgment. (Para 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)
C.M.No.1235/2021
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) No.479/2021
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondent No. 2 to 5 to give the benefit of the 2nd MACP to the Petitioner No.1 to 6 in the pay scale of Sub Inspector @ Rs.9300-34800/- with Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- upon completion of 20 years of regular service with the CRPF, from their respective due dates of year 2005 by treating the MACP as applicable since 1st January 2006 onwards.
2. Petitioners further pray for a direction to the respondents to pay the arrears in the above terms after rectification of their pay scale along with consequential arrears arising therefrom.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
