Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M., J
K.N.FAJAR S/o. C.K.KASMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
“a. issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Ext.P13 order and Ext.P12 order ;
b. issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent to consider afresh Ext.P7 representation filed by the petitioner ;
c. pass such other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to grant in the circumstances of the case ;
and
d. award costs.”
2. Petitioner is the Managing Partner of an entity engaged in the business of household items. In the year 2005, he had applied for and was allotted storage space in certain rooms measuring 6364 sq. feet in the Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium by the 2nd respondent Greater Cochin Development Authority (GCDA) as per Ext.P1 offer letter dated 28.03.2005 upon depositing the amounts as directed therein and upon compliance with the conditions therein. It was specifically stipulated in Ext.P1 that a licence agreement had to be registered at the cost and expense of the petitioner within 15 days of remittance of the advance amount and that permission to use the space will be g
The principle of natural justice requires that procedural irregularities do not invalidate decisions unless they cause prejudice, affirming the legitimacy of governmental actions.
A lease agreement must be executed for rent to be collectible; without it, claims for rent are invalid.
Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 is limited to reviewing the legality of process rather than re-evaluating facts. Eviction upheld for breaches of lease conditions.
The assessment of damages for unauthorized property use persists despite prior communications, reaffirmed by policy provisions, with petitioners failing to establish rights for commercial utilization....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to follow the Principles of Natural Justice in quasi-judicial proceedings, the lack of evidence of subletting of the actual governm....
Mere payment of damages does not create a right in favour of a person who may otherwise be illegally occupying public premises.
The court emphasized that eviction under the Public Premises Act requires subjective satisfaction of unauthorized occupation, ensuring fairness in administrative actions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
