IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
Shanavas, S/o Abubacker – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
This bail application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.
2. Petitioners are the 1st and 3rd accused in Crime No.173/2025 of Thrikkunnappuzha Police Station, Alappuzha. Now the case is transferred to Alappuzha North Police Station and the case is pending as Crime No.519/2025 The above case is registered against the petitioners alleging offences punishable under Section 376(2)(n), 323, 324, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The prosecution case is that the 1st petitioner/1st accused committed rape on the victim and the 2nd petitioner who is the 3rd accused threatened the victim that the video of the victim will be shared in social media. It is also alleged that the 1st petitioner presented the victim to the 2nd accused and the 2nd accused also committed rape on her. Hence, it is alleged that the accused committed the offence.
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The counsel for the petitioners submitted that, even if the entire allegations are accepted, the offence of rape is not committed. The counsel submitted that, even according to the defacto complainant, the 1st
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception; conditions imposed to ensure cooperation with the investigation and prevent absconding.
Bail granted due to lack of evidence for custodial necessity and initial consent in alleged acts.
The court ruled that consensual relationships turning sour do not justify rape allegations or automatic custodial interrogation, emphasizing the need for substantial evidence before arrest.
The court determined that lack of evidence justified granting bail to the accused despite serious allegations.
Pre-arrest bail requires a special case to be made, especially when serious allegations are involved.
The court allowed bail based on insufficient evidence for continued detention, emphasizing presumptive innocence.
The court emphasizes the gravity of the allegations and denies bail based on the serious nature of the accusations and evidence presented.
The court grants bail under specific conditions when evidence does not necessitate further detention.
The court emphasized the distinction between consensual sex and rape, ruling that personal liberty is paramount and should only be curtailed when necessary.
Insufficient grounds to deny bail due to lack of evidence connecting the applicant to the crime.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.