SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 1687

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.BADHARUDEEN
Pushpangadhan S/o Sreedharan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : V. Sethunath, S. Justus
For the Respondent: Sheeba Thomas

JUDGMENT :

1. The sole accused in S.C. No.421/2012 on the files of the Additional Sessions Court-II, Thalassery, has come up in appeal challenging the conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Sessions Judge as per the judgment dated 07.08.2014. The State of Kerala, represented by the Public Prosecutor is arrayed as the sole respondent herein.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor, in detail. Perused the verdict under challenge and the records of the trial court.

3. In a nutshell, the prosecution case is that, at about 05.25 p.m. on 21.10.2009, the accused was found in possession of 2.5 litre of Arrack infront of the shop situated near Kurumpamoozhi Junction of Kollamula Village, against the prohibitions contained in the Kerala Abkari Act and thereby committed the offence punishable under Section 8(1) read with 8(2) of the Kerala Abkari Act. The case was charge sheeted by the Excise Inspector, Ranny Range Office.

4. Initially, the case was committed to the Sessions Court and later made over to the Additional District and Sessions Court-II for hearing and disposal.

5. After, framing charge for the offence under Section 8(1) read with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top