IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
D.K. SINGH, J.
Kanthanathan R. S/o Ramanathan - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
W.P. (C) Nos. 33291, 35376 of 2024
Decided On : 25-06-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident of ragging and administrative failures. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. inquiry into the administrative lapses. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. responsibilities of officials in administrative matters. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. roles and prerogatives of the chancellor. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. supreme court guidelines on ragging. (Para 19 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. court's directives for accountability and future actions. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
D.K. SINGH, J.
1. Heard Mr P C Sasidharan and Ms Sneha M S learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners; Mr P Sreekumar learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr S Prasanth, learned Standing Counsel for the Chancellor of Universities; Mr Manu Govind learned Standing Counsel for Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University; Ms Nisha George learned Counsel of the 6th respondent and Mr Premchand R Nair learned Senior Government Pleader.
Facts
2. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.35376/2024, Dr M.K. Narayanan, was functioning as Dean of the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences of the Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (KVASU). The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.33291/2024 is the Assistant Warden of the Men’s Hostel of KVASU. Being the Dean of the Colleges, the petitioner, Dr M.K. Narayanan, was the Warden of the said Hostel. One student, Sidharthan J S, a second-year BVSc and AH course of the College, aged around 21 years as on the date of the incident, was found hanging in the bathroom of the dormitory of the Undergraduate Men’s Hostel in the College Campus on 18.02.2024.
2.1 The complaint and information received from some students at the College by the UGC Anti-ragging helpline was transmitted to the Dean of the college, with a copy to the Vice Chancellor. An anti-ragging squad of the College investigated the case, and its report confirmed that Sidharthan J S was subjected to brutal physical abuse and public trial by a section of students, which amounted to ragging.
3. The report of the anti-ragging squad dated 01.03.2024 and07.03.2024 confirmed the ragging of the deceased student, holding the Dean and the Assistant Warden responsible for administrative lapses and failure in observing the Rules and Regulations prohibiting ragging in Higher Education Institutions. Accordingly, the Vice-Chancellor called for an explanation from Dr M.K. Narayanan and Dr R. Kanthanathan, the petitioners in these two writ petitions, who were the Dean and the Assistant Warden, respectively, having immediate responsibility to ensure the right behaviour and maintain discipline of the hostel inmates.
4. A three-member Inquiry Committee was constituted by the Vice Chancellor of the University to inquire into the alleged administrative lapses on the part of the petitioners leading to the death of Sidharthan J S on 18.02.2024 at the UG Men’s hostel of the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pookode, Wayanad District, Kerala, a constituent College of the University. The said Inquiry Report is part of W.P.(C) No.33291/2024 as Ext.P9.
4.1 The notice issued to Dr M.K. Narayanan, Dean, directed him to furnish an explanation on the following points:
“1. Failure on knowing the reported ragging and the torture of Sidharthan J.S in Hostel room and Hostel premises.
2. Failure of keeping in place, in Hostel and its premises the needed precautions, to prevent such an unruly behaviour of some sections of students.
3. Failure or routine patrolling and inspection in Hostels by Assistant Warden and Warden
4. Failure of bringing the incident of death of student Sidharthan J.S to Police and Higher authorities in time.
5. Failure to report the assaulting of the Sidharthan J.S to the parents or the University Officials by the Dean or any other College officials.
6. Failure to give a convincing explanation to the parents and Higher authorities about the situations leading to death of the student Sidharthan J.S.
7. Failure of reporting by students & teachers about the incident of ragging through any of the phone numbers displayed in the mandatory anti-
The court established that educational authorities must enforce anti-ragging regulations proactively to prevent student harm, holding administrators accountable for lapses in ensuring campus safety.
Section 13 of University Act, 2000 clearly states that Registrar shall be a full time officer of University and shall be appointed by State Government.
Disciplinary proceedings must adhere to principles of natural justice, requiring specific allegations to be communicated to the accused for a fair hearing.
The Chancellor's suspension of the Vice-Chancellor was invalid due to failure to consult the State Government, violating procedural safeguards and natural justice principles.
A quasi-judicial authority forming part of a statutory body corporate cannot challenge the appellate order of the Chancellor, its head and superior authority, except in cases of patent illegality or ....
Appointment as Vice-Chancellor of University – While preparing panel, Search Committee must give proper weightage to academic excellence; exposure to higher education system in country and abroad, an....
The court can appoint an observer to oversee and approve actions taken by the management of the university in the midst of disputes and allegations.
The removal of a Vice Chancellor without adherence to statutory provisions and principles of natural justice is invalid.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.