Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B.SNEHALATHA
Navin Scariah, S/o. Scariah M.M. – Appellant
Versus
Priya Abraham, D/o. Annie Thomas – Respondent
Key Points: - The court emphasizes that parental responsibilities persist after marital dissolution and advocates cooperative parenting for the child’s rights. (!) - The court permits the father to participate in the child’s therapy and education, ensuring this does not distress the child. (!) - The contempt case is closed with directions that the petitioner be part of therapy sessions and monitor the child’s educational progress and personal life, without causing distress, and that the respondent will facilitate this involvement. (!) (!) (!)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court stresses child’s rights and the need for cooperative parenting. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 2. contempt case closed with directions for parental involvement. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT :
(Devan Ramachandran, J.)
The petitioner says that he has approached this Court through this contempt case under the impression – which perhaps is not true any more – that the mother is not allowing the child to interact with him, in spite of the directions in the judgment earlier delivered.
2. Smt.Smruthi Sasidharan – learned counsel for the petitioner, explained that his client filed this contempt case not to invoke any action against the respondent, but under the afore wrong impression; but that his real intent is to be part of his child’s life, as any father would wish for. She thus prayed that this contempt case be closed; but that it be clarified that her client can be part of the schooling and therapy sessions of his child – she being a special one – so that his obligations as a parent can be discharged by him to his satisfaction.
3. Sri.V.Philip Mathews – learned counsel for the respondent, in response, began saying that his client has never violated the orders of this Court, but that the child w
The court prioritizes the child's rights to parental involvement over marital disputes, emphasizing the need for cooperative parenting.
The court prioritized the child's rights to unconditional care from both parents, allowing the father access to the child's therapy and education while emphasizing collaborative parenting.
Custody arrangements must ensure the child's participation in activities is facilitated and not hindered by custody decisions.
A party who is fully aware of the court orders and acts in violation thereof, commits contempt of court, even if the party did not appreciate that the act or omission breached the order.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
