IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
Indu. S D/o P.G. Sasidharan – Appellant
Versus
Thomas @ Manoj S/o Joseph – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. impact of parental conflict on children (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 2. background of custody dispute (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. arguments from both parties (Para 18 , 19) |
| 4. court's observations on child's trauma (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
Devan Ramachandran, J.
Parental conflicts are not mere legal matters; they are reflections of interpersonal problems between couples, which require interpersonal solutions.
2. Unfortunately, it are the children involved, who are forced to share or bear the dysfunction that occurs in such scenario; exacerbated by the often noticed fact that their interests are seen with less priority by the parents, as they deal with the emotional and psychological side to it.
3. Often, in the maelstrom of emotions, the children are sometimes forgotten; and this can be devastating for them and leave scars on their psyche permanently.
4. Husband and wife can and may fight; but one cannot fathom how they, as parents, can fight.
5. Husband and wife can be separated or divorced; but, as parents, their bond is interminable, till death part them.
6. Unfortunately, this is lost to most couples in matrimonial strife.
7. Children w
The court emphasized that the welfare of the child is paramount in custody disputes, and children should not be subjected to court appearances unless necessary.
The court affirmed that children's welfare must be prioritized in custody disputes, emphasizing the psychological impact of litigation on children and ordering minimal courtroom exposure.
Custody arrangements must prioritize children's welfare and emotional needs, advocating a shift from parent-centric to a children-centric approach to ensure their best interests.
The court underscores the importance of prioritizing the child's wellbeing in custody disputes while ensuring prompt judicial review.
Custody arrangements involving children must prioritize their mental and physical health and avoid involving police stations or court premises.
Custody arrangements for children must prioritize their mental and physical health, avoiding environments that may cause trauma, such as police stations.
The court underscores the paramount importance of a child's right to spend time with both parents during custody disputes.
Custodial arrangements must consider children's agency and preferences, prohibiting forced interactions with estranged parents.
The court prioritizes the child's best interests, emphasizing a stable environment free from parental conflict.
The court emphasized the importance of avoiding exposure of children to potentially traumatic environments during custody exchanges, modifying the exchange location to protect the child's welfare.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.