Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA
Anitta Merin Markose D/o Markose – Appellant
Versus
Boney Varghese S/o Gee Varghese – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. process of the family court regarding additional pleadings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding the merits of allowing additional written statements. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis on the family court's exercise of discretion. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, J.
1. The petitioner challenges Ext.P8 order of the learned Family Court, Kattappana, through which it allowed I.A.No.8/2025 in O.P.(RM) 84/2023.
2. The Original Petition above mentioned was filed by the petitioner seeking return of her patrimony from the respondents and the latter filed a written statement.
3. The Original Petition, admittedly, then went to trial, with both sides adducing evidence, which was thereafter closed. However, subsequent to the closure of evidence, the respondents filed I.A.No.8/2025, seeking leave of the Court – under Order VIII Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - to file an ‘additional written statement’; saying that there were inadvertent omissions in the original written statement in denying some of the assertions made by the petitioner in the Original Petition.
4. This application was opposed vehemently by the petitioner, con
Judicial discretion under Order VIII Rule 9 of the CPC to allow additional pleadings must be exercised judiciously and cannot disregard the closure of evidence or claim of prejudice.
The interpretation of Order VIII Rule 9 of the CPC affirms the plaintiff's right to file a rejoinder to a written statement, ensuring fair opportunity to respond to the defendant's claims.
Judicial discretion permits amendments to pleadings if justified, aiming for effective dispute resolution while maintaining procedural integrity.
Subsequent pleadings under Order 8 Rule 9 CPC cannot introduce new causes of action and must relate to existing issues, with the court retaining discretion to allow or deny such applications based on....
A trial court may allow filing of an additional written statement under Order 8 Rule 9 of CPC when trial has not commenced, emphasizing judicial discretion and the need to avoid prejudice in litigati....
Amendments to pleadings must not change the fundamental nature of the case or introduce contradictory claims and should be sought diligently within the timeframe set by law.
The court established that the right to file a rejoinder is crucial for ensuring that parties can adequately contest new facts introduced in litigation, reinforcing the procedural rights under Order ....
The court held that procedural unfairness due to technical irregularities can justify allowing the filing of Written Statements after delays, emphasizing the importance of justice over procedural str....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
