IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SYAM KUMAR V.M.
Owners And Parties Interested In The Vessel, M.V. Korea Chemi – Appellant
Versus
Siluvaipichai Francies, S/O Francies – Respondent
ORDER :
SYAM KUMAR V.M., J.
This application is filed under Order VII Rule 11 r/w Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the applicants, who are defendants 1 and 2 in the above Admiralty Suit seeking to reject the plaint inter alia for being barred by the provisions of Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017. Respondents in the I.A. are plaintiffs 1 to 6 and defendants 3 to 5.
2. The bare facts relevant for the disposal of this I.A. are as follows:
Plaintiffs (Respondents 1 to 6 in the I.A.) are fishermen engaged in the avocation of deep sea fishing. On 19.10.2023, at 10.20 P.M., while they were engaged in fishing onboard the fishing boat MERCY ANNAI off the Kannur Coast, beyond the territorial waters of India, the 2nd defendant vessel collided with the fishing boat causing plaintiff Nos.1 and 4 to be thrown into the sea. The 2nd defendant is a foreign flag vessel. At the time of filing of the suit, the 2nd defendant was anchored at Nhava Sheva port limits under the Jawaharlal Nehru Port, Mumbai. The 1st defendant is the owner/party interested in the 2nd defendant vessel. The 3rd defendant is the Master of the vessel. The 4th and 5th defe
Ponnala Lakshmaiah v. Kommuri Pratap Reddy and others
Dahiben v. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (Gajra) dead through LRs and others
Sopan Sukhdeo Sable v. Assistant Charity Commissioner and others
Pankajakshi (dead) Through LRs and others v. Chandrika and others
Court's jurisdiction to entertain admiralty suits is limited to incidents occurring within its territorial waters; claims cannot proceed if the vessel is beyond those limits.
Admiralty jurisdiction is confined to territorial waters, and actions in personam require the defendant to reside or conduct business in India; plaint not rejected as filed before Section 12A's effec....
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has jurisdiction to execute foreign judgments under Section 44A, affirming its original admiralty authority to enforce decrees against vessels located within its territo....
The court confirmed that maritime claims under the Admiralty Act, 2017 allow arresting a vessel for dues irrespective of ownership, emphasizing the ship's distinct legal personality.
Claims under the Fatal Accidents Act related to maritime collisions are under Admiralty jurisdiction, barring local courts.
The Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017 applies to vessels registered under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, and allows for the arrest of a vessel in a proceeding in ....
The court established that the arrest of a vessel under the Admiralty Act requires strict adherence to the conditions set forth in Section 5, and failure to meet these conditions renders the arrest o....
An action in rem under admiralty law can proceed despite an arbitration clause, as such actions are intended for obtaining security for maritime claims.
An action in rem can occur under admiralty jurisdiction despite the presence of an arbitration clause in a charter-party. The court maintained jurisdiction to arrest the vessel for securing maritime ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.