SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 2488

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S. Manu, J.
Faris K.R., S/o. K.Y.Rasheed and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By Its Secretary To Government, Local Self Government Department And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No. 34632 of 2015, WP(C) No. 35818 of 2015, WP(C) No. 37887 of 2015, WP(C) No. 39110 of 2016, WP(C) No. 10669 of 2024
Decided On : 30-06-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri.P.Ravindran (Sr.), Sri.K.Praveen Kumar
For the Respondent: Sri.I.V.Pramod, Shri.R.Azad Babu, Sc, Alappuzha Municipality, Shri.Jose Jones Joseph, Sudhi Vasudevan, Sr, Adv Tony Augustine, Gp

Local authorities must require No Due Certificates from the Kerala Cultural Activists' Welfare Fund Board for cinema license renewal, as mandated by the Kerala Local Authorities Entertainments Tax Act.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Cultural Activists' Welfare Fund Act, 2010; Kerala Local Authorities Entertainments Tax Act, 1961; Kerala Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1958 - Renewal of cinema licenses - Local authorities required to insist on No Dues Certificates from Kerala Cultural Activists' Welfare Fund Board as a pre-condition for license renewal. Court emphasizes legislative intent of enforcing cess collection as part of licensing requirements. (Paras 1, 9, 10, 12)

(B) Licensing Authorities - Authorities are justified in demanding No Due Certificates under Kerala Local Authorities Entertainments Tax Act as per S.6(4), which has overriding effect over the Cinemas Regulation Act. Court finds no merit in petitions attempting to evade liability for cess payment. (Paras 5, 6, 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners challenged the insistence of local authorities for No Due Certificates for the renewal of cinema licenses, claiming no basis in statutory provisions.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that strict compliance with cess collection is mandated by law, and licenses cannot be renewed without proof of cess payment.

Issues: The main issue was the legality of requiring a No Due Certificate for license renewal under the specified Acts.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the provisions for cess and tax collection are directly applicable to license renewal, emphasizing the necessity of compliance with statutory obligations by cinema proprietors.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. establishment of the kerala cultural activists' welfare fund (Para 1 , 2)
2. requirement of no due certificates for license renewal (Para 3 , 4)
3. justification for insistence on no due certificates (Para 5 , 6)
4. importance of compliance with cess collection and payment (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
5. court's conclusion on the meritless petitions (Para 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT :

S. Manu, J.

Kerala Cultural Activists' Welfare Fund Act, 2010 was enacted to constitute a fund for the welfare of cultural activists. In order to provide monetary resource for the Fund, Section 3C was incorporated into the Kerala Local Authorities Entertainments Tax Act, 1961, by Amendment Act of 2013.

2. Much later, G.O.No.(Rt.)No.137/2024/LSGD dated 18.1.2024 was issued with directions to the authorities concerned for proper collection of the cess, its remittance in the account of the Welfare Fund Board and issuance of No Due Certificate to the proprietors of cinema theaters.

3. Main grievance raised in these writ petitions is regarding insistence by the Secretaries of the Local Authorities concerned for production of ‘No Due Certificate’ issued by the Kerala Cultural Activists' Welfare Fund Board for renewal of license under the Kerala Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1958.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners argued that no provision in the Kerala Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1958 and the Kerala Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1988 provide for submitting ‘No Due Certificates’ issued by the Kerala Cultural Activists' Welfare Fund Board as a pre-condition for renewal of license. They therefore contended that, while exercising the power to renew the license under the Kerala Cinemas Regulation Act, Secretaries of the Local Authorities cannot insist for production of such certificates. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, such demand would be illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable. Therefore, they submitted that the Local Authorities may be directed to renew licenses under the Kerala Cinemas (Regulation) Act without insisting for submitting No Due Certificates. They referred to various provisions of the Kerala Cinemas (Regulation) Act and the Rules and pointed out that no provisions are available which would enable the licensing authority to insist for payment of cess under Section 3C of the Kerala Local Authorities Entertainments Tax Act, 1961 and production of its proof for renewing the license.

5. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Kerala Cultural Activists' Welfare Fund Board on the other hand contended that the petitioners are attempting to evade the liability to remit cess collected from the viewers under Section 3C of the Kerala Local Authorities Entertainments Tax Act. He argued that the licensing authorities under the Kerala Cinemas (Regulation) Act are undoubtedly justified, rather bound to insist for production of No Due Certificate issued by the Board. The learned counsel referred to sub-section (6) of Section 3C of the Local Authorities Entertainments Tax Act and pointed out that provisions of Sections 5, 6, 7, 7A, 8, 9 and 10 shall apply in respect of cess on tickets for admission to cinema and the word 'tax' therein shall be construed as to include 'cess' also. He then referred to Section 6 of the Act of 1961 which deals with manner of payment of tax. Section 6 (4) reads as follows:-

6. Manner of payment of tax:

.........

(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Kerala Cinemas Regulation Act, 1958 (32 of 1958) or in the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (13 of 1994) or in the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994 (20 of 1994), no licence or permit for conducting a cinema theatre and exhibition there of shall be renewed by the local authority concerned unless the proprietor of such theatre has remitted the entertainment tax due up to the preceding month.”

6. Learned Senior Counsel argued that the above provision clearly provides that no license or permits for conducting a cinema theatre and exhibition thereof shall be renewed by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top