Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN
Santhy Krishnan W/o Late Binoy Chandran – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This is an application for anticipatory bail, filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by the sole accused in Crime No.1688/2025 of Muvattupuzha police station, Ernakulam.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, in detail. Perused the records, and the case diary at length.
3. Here, the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Sections 465, 468, 471, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Section 13 (1)(c) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, by the sole accused in this case.
4. The prosecution allegation is that the accused had worked as a writer of Traffic Enforcement Unit, Muvattupuzha during the period from 2009 to 31.10.2021. During 2015, the money collected by various police officers was entrusted to the accused, after recording the same in the TR-5 Book, which was meant for deposit in State Bank of India, Aluva Branch in A/c.No.30721006307, and also in A/c.No.08652 of State Bank of India, Aramanappady Branch. While depositing the amount, the petitioner/accused, by preparing the original, duplicate and triplicate expenditure voucher slips, showed
Anticipatory bail in serious corruption cases requires exceptional circumstances, which the applicant failed to demonstrate.
Anticipatory bail granted with conditions for investigation despite misappropriation allegations.
Anticipatory bail in corruption cases requires exceptional circumstances; mere involvement in financial fraud without compelling evidence does not justify bail.
Anticipatory bail requires proof of exceptional circumstances; mere violation of departmental norms does not suffice to overturn strong evidence of corruption and misappropriation.
Anticipatory bail denied due to serious allegations of financial misappropriation, necessitating custodial interrogation.
Anticipatory bail denied due to risk of obstruction in investigation involving serious financial misconduct.
Anticipatory bail in corruption cases requires exceptional circumstances; mere presumption of innocence is insufficient.
The necessity of custodial interrogation for effective investigation in cases of alleged financial misconduct.
Bail applications in subordinate courts should be decided within one week and in High Courts within two-three weeks.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
