SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 2724

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P.
Appukuttan, S/o.Kutty – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : ADV SMT.G.VIDYA
For the Respondent: SRI. VIPIN NARAYAN

Table of Content
1. death of appellant does not abate appeal if relatives are disinterested. (Para 1 , 2)
2. consideration of relative's interests and contesting appeals after death. (Para 3 , 5)
3. rights of legal representatives concerning fine and convict's estate. (Para 7 , 8)
4. court's discretion to dismiss appeals based on relatives' interests. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT :

Crl. Appeal No. 260/2016 arises from SC No.570/2009 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge-III, Pathanamthitta. The trial court by judgment dated 02.12.2015 convicted the appellant/1st accused for an offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of two years and fine of Rs.5000/-. In default of payment of fine, the appellant/1st accused was to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of three months.

3. In Pazhani v. State of Kerala, 2017 (1) KLT 341 (F.B.), a Full Bench of this court examined the question of whether an appeal against conviction and sentence (including a fine) will abate upon the death of the appellant if no near relatives come forward to prosecute the appeal. The court ruled that the case will be consigned to the record,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top