SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 2762

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
AMIT RAWAL, P.V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ.
Petroleum Traders Welfare And Legal Service Society, Represented By Its Chairman Luke Thomas, S/o. Thomas and Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By Its Secretary, LSG Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram and Ors. – Respondents
WA No. 2249 of 2025
Decided On : 18-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Sri. Adarsh Kumar, Sri. Shashank Devan, Sri. K.M. Aneesh, Shri. Yadu Krishnan P.M.
For the Respondents: O.M. Shalina, Deputy Solicitor General Of India, Sri Suman Chakravarthy, Sri M. Gopikrishnan Nambiar, Sri M.V. Haridas Menon.

The court affirmed that toilet facilities in retail outlets may be designated for public use but discretion lies with the operator to ensure safety and manage access appropriately.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 300A - The writ petition sought to declare the private toilets maintained by petroleum retail outlet dealers as private properties and protect them from being converted into public toilets. The respondents were directed to restrain from enforcing such actions. (Paras 1, 3, 4)

(B) Administrative Law - The necessary discretion allowed to managers regarding the use of toilets by the general public emphasizes their role in maintaining safety and managing facility usage appropriately. The court upheld that access should not be mandated beyond staff and customers. (Paras 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, association of retail outlet dealers, challenged local authorities attempting to proclaim their toilets as public facilities based on a circular from the Ministry of Road Transport. They sought an order to maintain these as private toilets.

Findings of Court:
The court modified the interim order, allowing petroleum outlet toilets to be used by customers and transit travellers while maintaining discretion for general public access.

Issues: The controversy centered around the private nature of restrooms versus public provision. The court considered safety and managerial discretion critical in this context.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided that while public access to toilet facilities is essential, it is equally vital to maintain the safety of the premises, thus allowing outlet operators discretion in managing public access.

Result: Writ appeal stands disposed off with modifications.

Table of Content
1. legal validity of maintaining private toilet facilities. (Para 2)
2. context of local administrative actions proposing public toilet usage. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments about the necessity and safety of public access. (Para 6 , 9 , 10 , 12)
4. court's modification regarding access permissions. (Para 14 , 16)

JUDGMENT :

AMIT RAWAL, J.

The appellants-writ petitioners, had approached the Single Bench of this Court vide writ petition on the premise that they are registered association of Petroleum retail outlet dealers carrying out the retail outlet dealership business across the length and breadth of the Kerala State, registered under the Tranvancore- Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955. For the purpose of carrying out the activities of the retail outlets had entered into a separate retail outlet dealership agreement with various Oil Marketing Companies such as Indian Oil Corporation, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited of catering Petrol, Diesel, gas and other gasoline needs of the various customers across the State. It has about 300 retail outlets having vast experience in the field of the retail outlets and had attempted to espouse their grievance by claiming the following reliefs in the writ petition:

“i. Declare that the private toilets constructed and maintained by petroleum retail outlet dealers within premises of their respective retail outlets are private properties enjoying protection under Article 300A of the Constitution of India and that the respondent authorities are not authorized under any extant law in force to convert or portray such private toilets maintained as public toilets to be used by the general public in light of the specific provisions under the Petroleum Act, Petroleum Rules, 2002 and also exhibit P2(E);

ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the 2nd respondents to remove exhibits P2, P2(A), P2(B), P2(C), P2(D) from the premises of the retail outlet of the petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 herein and thereby refrain from carrying out any acts in the nature of converting or portraying the private toilet maintained within the premises of the said retail outlet as a public toilet to be used by the general public as the same would fall foul of Article 300A of the Constitution of India ;

iii. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, direction or order interdicting the respondents herein from carrying out any acts in the nature of converting or portraying the private toilet maintained within the premises of retail outlets of member petroleum retail outlet dealers affiliated to the 1st petitioner as a public toilet to be used by the general public as the same would fall foul of Article 300A of the Constitution of India ;

iv. To dispense with the filing of translation of exhibited documents in vernacular language;

v. To issue any other writ or order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2. The pith and substances of the reliefs claimed aforementioned reveals that the cause of action accrued in favour of the appellants – writ petitioners on the ground that the local administration started putting up posters on the toilets maintained in the retail outlets, to be used as a public toilets, whereas in essence, the Ministry of Road and Transport had issued a circular dated 26.12.2013 on the subject of maintenance of drinking water and toilet facilities at few stations along the National Highways. The said circular reads as under:

“GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS

Parivahan Bhavan,

1, Sansad Marg

New Delhi-110001

RW/NH-33023/19/99-DOIII(Part)

Dated the 26th December, 2013

To,

1. The Chief Secretaries of all State Governments/U.Ts.

2. The Principal Secretaries /Secretaries of all States/U.Ts. Public Works Department dealing with National Highways, other Centrally Sponsored Schemes and State Schemes.

3. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top