IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
AMIT RAWAL, P.V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ.
Petroleum Traders Welfare And Legal Service Society, Represented By Its Chairman Luke Thomas, S/o. Thomas and Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By Its Secretary, LSG Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram and Ors. – Respondents
WA No. 2249 of 2025
Decided On : 18-09-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal validity of maintaining private toilet facilities. (Para 2) |
| 2. context of local administrative actions proposing public toilet usage. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments about the necessity and safety of public access. (Para 6 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. court's modification regarding access permissions. (Para 14 , 16) |
JUDGMENT :
AMIT RAWAL, J.
The appellants-writ petitioners, had approached the Single Bench of this Court vide writ petition on the premise that they are registered association of Petroleum retail outlet dealers carrying out the retail outlet dealership business across the length and breadth of the Kerala State, registered under the Tranvancore- Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955. For the purpose of carrying out the activities of the retail outlets had entered into a separate retail outlet dealership agreement with various Oil Marketing Companies such as Indian Oil Corporation, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited of catering Petrol, Diesel, gas and other gasoline needs of the various customers across the State. It has about 300 retail outlets having vast experience in the field of the retail outlets and had attempted to espouse their grievance by claiming the following reliefs in the writ petition:
“i. Declare that the private toilets constructed and maintained by petroleum retail outlet dealers within premises of their respective retail outlets are private properties enjoying protection under
ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the 2nd respondents to remove exhibits P2, P2(A), P2(B), P2(C), P2(D) from the premises of the retail outlet of the petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 herein and thereby refrain from carrying out any acts in the nature of converting or portraying the private toilet maintained within the premises of the said retail outlet as a public toilet to be used by the general public as the same would fall foul of
iii. Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, direction or order interdicting the respondents herein from carrying out any acts in the nature of converting or portraying the private toilet maintained within the premises of retail outlets of member petroleum retail outlet dealers affiliated to the 1st petitioner as a public toilet to be used by the general public as the same would fall foul of
iv. To dispense with the filing of translation of exhibited documents in vernacular language;
v. To issue any other writ or order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. The pith and substances of the reliefs claimed aforementioned reveals that the cause of action accrued in favour of the appellants – writ petitioners on the ground that the local administration started putting up posters on the toilets maintained in the retail outlets, to be used as a public toilets, whereas in essence, the Ministry of Road and Transport had issued a circular dated 26.12.2013 on the subject of maintenance of drinking water and toilet facilities at few stations along the National Highways. The said circular reads as under:
“GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS Parivahan Bhavan, 1, Sansad Marg New Delhi-110001 RW/NH-33023/19/99-DOIII(Part) Dated the 26th December, 2013 To, 1. The Chief Secretaries of all State Governments/U.Ts. 2. The Principal Secretaries /Secretaries of all States/U.Ts. Public Works Department dealing with National Highways, other Centrally Sponsored Schemes and State Schemes. 3. Th |
The court affirmed that toilet facilities in retail outlets may be designated for public use but discretion lies with the operator to ensure safety and manage access appropriately.
Authorities must adhere to regulatory guidelines when issuing permissions; however, prior involvement in proceedings mitigates claims of prejudice due to non-hearing.
The petitioner lacked locus standi to file the writ petition, prompting the court to permit filing a Public Interest Litigation.
The court upheld that urban fuel stations are exempt from minimum distance requirements under the NHAI guidelines to ensure public access.
The court ruled that competition in business does not justify restraining operations of a legal entity unless fundamental rights are infringed, affirming the legality of setting up fuel stations acco....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.