SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Cal) 261

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
AMRITA SINHA, J.
Sarkar Fuel Station & Anr. - Appellant
Vs.
The Union of India & Ors. - Respondent
WPA 11363 of 2025 With WPA 7776 of 2024
Decided On : 29-07-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Writ Petitioners:- Mr. Atarup Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Sourav Basu, Adv. Mr. Rajdeep Pramanik, Adv. Ms. S. Roy, Adv.
For the Union of India : Ms. Debjani Ghosal, Adv. Mr. Sanajit Kumar Ghosh, Adv. Mr. Guddu Singh, Adv.
For the IOCL : Mr. Amit Kr. Nag, Adv. Mr. Partha Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Y. Bhattacharyya, Adv.
For the NHAI : Ms. Manika Roy, Adv. Ms. Ankita Choudhury, Adv. Mr. Atanu Sur, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Pratik Dhar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Samir Halder, Adv. Ms. Cardina Roy, Adv.

The court upheld that urban fuel stations are exempt from minimum distance requirements under the NHAI guidelines to ensure public access.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The permissions for construction of fuel stations are governed by the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways dated 26th June, 2020. Facts of the Case: Petitioners challenge NHAI's approval to IOCL for a retail outlet, asserting proximity violations to guidelines.

Findings of Court:
The location qualifies as urban, thus minimum distance restrictions do not apply.

Issues: The core issue was whether the NHAI violated guidelines by granting permission to IOCL.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that no distance was required as the area was classified urban under NHAI guidelines, emphasizing public necessity over individual business concerns.

Result: Both the writ petitions fail and are hereby dismissed.

Table of Content
1. writ petitions filed for relief against nhai's fuel station sanction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. respondent argues permission complies with urban guidelines, dismissing minimum distance claims. (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 15 , 19)
3. court emphasizes that urban areas do not require minimum distance between fuel stations. (Para 21 , 23 , 25 , 28 , 31)
4. court underlines that competitive business cannot be unduly restrained. (Para 30 , 35)
5. court dismisses both writ petitions for lack of merit. (Para 36)

JUDGMENT : 

Amrita Sinha, J.

1. The aforesaid two writ petitions have been filed praying for similar relief. The writ petitions are, accordingly, taken up for consideration analogously and disposed of by a common judgment.

2. Sarkar Fuel Station, the petitioner no. 1 in WPA 11363 of 2025, claims to be a partnership firm which is running a petrol pump situated beside NHAI-12 (old NH-34) upon obtaining approval from National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) from the year 2021. Animesh Baidya, the petitioner in WPA 7776 of 2024, has averred that he is associated with a petrol pump beside NH-12 (old NH-34).

3. Both the petitioners are aggrieved by the decision taken by NHAI in granting permission to Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) for setting up of a large format retail outlet on the self-same highway and they pray for a direction upon NHAI to recall the said sanction memo.

4. Submission of the petitioners is that the said permission is contrary to the guidelines/norms laid down by the Government of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways dated 26th June, 2020 relating to grant of permissions for construction of access to fuel stations, wayside amenities connecting roads, other properties, rest area complexes and such other facilities. The said guidelines are meant to be followed without any deviations.

5. It has been submitted that the minimum distance required to be maintained in between two fuel stations have not been adhered. According to the guidelines in respect of rural stretches of national highways an undivided carriageway has to be 300 metres and for divided carriageway it is 1000 metres. The restriction shall not apply in cases where access/egress for all fuel stations is provided through common service road of 7-metre width and not directly to national highway.

6. The petitioners submits that the distance between the petrol pump of the petitioner and the petrol pump which will be set up at the proposed site does not maintain the minimum distance as per the guidelines. The aforesaid discrepancy was brought to the knowledge of NHAI and the said authority, for resolving the dispute, has requested IOCL to stop the construction of approaches within NHAI row.

7. Prayer has been made to restrain NHAI from giving final approval to the sanction issued to IOCL for setting up of the petrol pump.

8. IOCL has filed a report annexing the guidelines for selection of dealers for regular and rural retail outlet. The guidelines disclose the manner for identification of locations for setting up of retail outlets. It mentions that regular retail outlets shall be located on highways (National Highways/State Highways etc.) and urban/semi urban areas (within municipal limits of a town). Rural retail outlets are located in rural areas but not on highways (National Highways/State Highways etc.) and outside municipal limits of a town.

9. IOCL contends that, there is no requirement of maintaining the minimum distance in between two retail outlets if the outlet is set up in urban/semi urban areas. In the instant case, place has been identified for setting up of regular retail outlet in accordance with the guidelines. As the outlet does not fall within the rural area, the minimum distance criteria will not apply.

10. Here, the proposed location is under the jurisdiction of Alal Gram Panchayat having population of 34244 as per 2011 census. Information was sought for from the urban local body/ authority specifying whether the propose

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top