IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J.
Usha J, W/o. D Sudheeraj – Appellant
Versus
Government Of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) No. 256 of 2024
Decided on : 11-09-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek payment and gratuity as per law. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. responses from the respondents outline their stance on gratuity. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court examines applicability of the 1972 act. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. previous rulings bolster petitioners' claims. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. court orders payment of dues to petitioners. (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT :
T.R.RAVI, J.
The writ petition has been filed praying for a direction to the respondents to release the arrears of Pay and Leave Surrender salary due to the petitioners as per the 7th Central Pay Revision Scales for the period from 01.01.2016, and to quash Exts.P9 and Ext.P10 to the extent they deny the right of the petitioners for retirement gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1972 Act'), and to disburse the amounts with interest and costs.
2. The petitioners retired on superannuation from the service of the 2nd respondent (hereinafter referred to as RCC) after 01.01.2016, and between 2018 and 2020. Petitioners have the qualifying service required for full pension. Exts.P4 to P8 give the service details of the petitioners, including their entry into service and length of service. Ext.P12 Government Order dated 6.2.1987 relates to the bifurcation of the staff and segregation of funds of the 2nd respondent. It says that terminal benefits applicable to the State Government employees who retire from service on superannuation, will be given to the employees of the Medical Education Department working in the RCC who opt for absorption, that conditional option will be treated as not opting for absorption in RCC and that on becoming regular employees of the RCC, they will be governed by the service rules of the RCC. By Ext.P1 Government Order dated 26.2.2021, revision of pay as per the 7th Central Pay Revision was sanctioned to the employees of RCC. Petitioners fall within the Non- Academic staff category and come under Sl.Nos.14,15, and 39 in Ext.P1. Paragraph II (b) of Ext.P1 says that the multiplication factor applicable on the existing basic pay (pay in the band + GP) as on 31.12.2015, is 2.57. Paragraph 5 of Ext.P1 shows that the date of effect of pay revision will be 1.1.2016, and allowances shall be prospective from 1.1.2021, and that arrears will be settled later.
3. Ext.P3 is the order issued on a request made by the 3rd petitioner, pursuant to directions issued by this Court. It is stated therein that the request for benefits of the 7th pay revision will be considered along with the case of all employees who retired from 1.1.2016 to 31.5.2021 on receiving clarification from the Government. Regarding gratuity, it is stated that the employees of RCC are governed by Rule 44(a) of the RCC Service Rules, and not by the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 . It is stated that RCC has been exempted from the provisions of the 1972 Act as per a statutory notification issued by the Government of Kerala. The petitioners submit that the Government has neither issued any clarification nor any statutory notification, exempting the RCC from the provisions of the 1972 Act. Regarding the pension, it is stated in Ext.P3 that it will be paid as 40% of Basic Pay + DA till modified orders are issued by the Government. By Ext.P9 order, the 1st respondent granted sanction for payment of an enhanced rate of DCRG of ₹17,00,000/- to the employees of the 2nd respondent. The amount payable under the 1972 Act was ₹20,00,000/-. However, the same was restricted to ₹17,00,000/- and that too on a prospective basis, subject to the condition that the additional financial commitment will be met from the own funds of the 2nd respondent. Ext.P9 is dated 21.11.2022. It can be seen from Ext.P10 order relating to the 3rd petitioner that the amount of gratuity was restricted to ₹10,00,000, even though the admissible retirement gratuity was ₹11,12,426/-.
4. Heard Sri S. Abdul Razzak, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri P.M.Sameer, Government Pleader, for the 1st res
State of Punjab v. Rafik Masih
Travancore Cochin Chemicals Ltd. v. Chandran V.
Chandrasekharan Nair v. Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Ltd.
Jyotirmay Ray v. Field General Manager, Punjab National Bank
Retirement gratuity is a statutory right under the Payment of Gratuity Act, and exemptions from the Act cannot apply retrospectively to negatively impact employees' entitlements.
Point of Law : If in the opinion of the appropriate Government, the employees of such establishments are in receipt of gratuity or pensionery benefits not less favourable than the benefits conferred ....
Railway employees are exempt from the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, as per amendments and judicial interpretations, affirming that Railway Service (Pension) Rules govern their gratuity rights.
It is a well settled principle of law that statutory rules cannot be altered or amended by executive orders or circulars or instructions nor can they replace the statutory rules. The rules made under....
The court upheld the government's policy decision to set a cut-off date for extending monetary benefits to retirees, affirming that such classifications are permissible under constitutional provision....
The statutory force of rules, impermissibility of creating two classes of pensioners, and the discriminatory nature of the classification were the central legal points established in the judgment.
Withholding gratuity post-retirement without notice or opportunity to contest alleged incorrect pay fixation is impermissible and deemed harsh.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 applies to all employees, including daily wage employees, and entitles them to gratuity for their entire ser....
Retiral benefits, including gratuity and pension, constitute vested property rights under Article 300A; delayed payment breaches the right to livelihood under Article 21, and employers must timely se....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.