HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA, AGARTALA
S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA, J.
Haripada Choudhury, Son of Lt. Naresh Bandhu Choudhury – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Tripura, To be represented by the Secretary, Department of Agriculture & Farmer’s Welfare, Govt. of Tripura and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.233 of 2024, WP(C) No.234 of 2024, WP(C) No.235 of 2024, WP(C) No.236 of 2024, WP(C) No.237 of 2024.
Decided On : 31-01-2025
JUDGMENT :
S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA, J.
The commacts and identical nature of disputes being involved, all the writ petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. All the petitioners were employees of Agriculture Department under Government of Tripura.
[2.1] In WP(C) No.233 of 2024, the petitioner retired from service attaining the age of superannuation on 30.06.2023 from the post of UDC. On his retirement, 75% of his gratuity amount was released and rest 25% was withheld. Initially, the petitioner joined as LDC on 15.06.1987 in the service under respondent No.2 and after completion of 10 years of service, he was given first gradation i.e. CAS-I on 15.06.1997 and on completion of 17 years of service in the same post, he was also granted second gradation i.e. CAS-II on 15.06.2004 and lastly, he was given third ACP benefit on 01.04.2015. He was, thereafter, promoted to the post of UDC (Ad-hoc) vide office order dated 23.09.2021. At the time of retirement, his last basic pay was shown to be Rs.62,600/-.
[2.2] It is alleged that for fixation of his pensionary benefits, his service book was sent to the office of AG (A&E), Agartala and vide letter dated 10.08.2023 (Annexure 5), the Senior Accounts Officer of the office of Accountant General (A&E), it was stated that on scrutiny of service book, his fixation of pay w.e.f. 01.01.1998 to 31.03.2017 was found to be incorrect. It was also further reflected in the said letter that pension and commutation of pension were already released in his favour on the basis of his last pay of Rs.62,600/- as per their calculation without the benefit of ad-hoc promotion and it was also stated that 25% of gratuity would be released on reply received from the office of Superintendent of Agriculture, Dukli Agri Sub-Division, Agartala. On 09.10.2023, another letter (Annexure 6) was sent by said Senior Accounts Officer to said Superintendent of Agriculture whereby service book of the petitioner was returned from the office of the Accountant General with a request to review the matter and to make revised regulation of pay in the service book under proper attestation and with preparation of due and drawn statement of overdrawal of pay, allowances, leave salary by the petitioner.
[2.3] Thereafter, the petitioner sent one representation to the respondents dated 26.12.2023 (Annexure 7) requesting them to release his rest amount of gratuity with interest. The Senior Accounts Officer also forwarded said representation to the Superintendent of Agriculture vide his letter dated 25.01.2024 (Annexure 8) for appropriate action from his end with further reflection of the fact that the pension and commutation of pension were already authorized by the office of AG to the petitioner on the basis of last pay of Rs.62,600/- and that withholding of DCRG would be settled on receipt of reply from the department. Under such circumstances, the petitioner has filed this writ petition for release of said 25% of gratuity i.e. Rs.2,50,000/- with interest @9% per annum and also to quash the letters dated 10.08.2023 and 09.10.2023.
[3.1] In WP(C) No.234 of 2024, similarly the petitioner retired from the service on 31.01.2023 from the post of UDC (Ad- hoc basis) and on her retirement, 75% of the gratuity was released but rest 25% of gratuity amounting to Rs.2,50,000/- was withheld on the ground, as reflected by Senior Accounts Officer vide his letter dated 07.08.2023 (Annexure 6), that fixation of her pay w.e.f. 15.06.1997 under ROP 1999 was found to be incorrect. By said letter, the Senior Accounts Officer requested the Superintendent of Agriculture, Bishalgarh Agri Sub-Division to review the matter and to prepare necessary due drawn statement of overdrawal. It was however, stated also that the commutation of pension in favour of said petitioner was released on the basis of her last pay of Rs.62,600/- as per calculation of the office of Accountant General without giving the benefit of ad-hoc promotion. [3.2] The
Withholding gratuity post-retirement without notice or opportunity to contest alleged incorrect pay fixation is impermissible and deemed harsh.
Recovery of excess payments from employees is impermissible when no fault or misrepresentation is established on their part.
Recovery of excess payments from retired employees is impermissible without adherence to natural justice, especially when payments were made for an extended period without notice.
Recovery of excess payments from retired employees is impermissible without due process, and the principle of natural justice mandates an opportunity to be heard before adverse actions.
Recovery of excess payments from employees without their fault violates principles of equity and fairness, especially when recovery occurs post-retirement and after a significant period.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.