Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, SYAM KUMAR V.M.
P. Rajan, S/o. Ponnaiha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By Its Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court examines basis for community status denial. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. final observations affirm scrutiny committee's findings. (Para 4 , 7) |
| 3. arguments highlight evidence of caste claim vs. scrutiny committee findings. (Para 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT :
Syam Kumar V.M., J.
The Writ Appeal is filed challenging the judgment dated 28.01.2021 of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.26459 of 2019. Appellant was the petitioner in the W.P.(C) and respondents were the respondents therein.
2. The W.P.(C) was filed by the appellant seeking to quash Exhibits P7, P8 and P9, whereby his claim of being a member of the Hindu (Sambava) Scheduled Caste community was rejected.
3. The learned Single Judge dismissed the W.P.(C) inter alia holding that there was no reason to interfere with the findings of the Scrutiny Committee for Verification of Community Certificates entered into after the due anthropological enquiry and that the conclusions in Exhibit P8 order of the scrutiny committee were based on material evidence collected by the committee. Holding that there was no reason to unsettle the findings of the respondents in Exhibit P7, Exhibit P8 and Exhibit P9, the W.P.(C) was dismissed. Aggrieved
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
